64.6. WIENER PROCESSES, ANOTHER APPROACH 2215

which shows that the inverse Fourier transform of ν is 0. Thus ν = 0. To see this, let ψ ∈S,the Schwartz class. Then neglecting troublesome constants in the Fourier transform,

0 =∫Rp

ψ (t)∫Rp

eit·ydν (y)dt =∫Rp

∫Rp

ψ (t)eit·ydtdν (y) = ν(F−1

ψ)

Now F−1 maps S onto S and so this reduces to∫Rp

ψdν = 0

for all ψ ∈S. By density of S in C0 (Rp) , it follows that the above holds for all ψ ∈C0 (Rp)and so ν = 0.

It follows that for every B Borel and for every such description of W(h).

0 =∫

XXB (W(h))dP =∫

XXW(h)−1(B)dP

Let K be sets of the form W(h)−1 (B) where B is of the form B1×·· ·×Bp,Bi open, thisfor some p. Then this is clearly a π system because the intersection of any two of them isanother one and

/0,Ω = W(h)−1 (Rp)

are both in K . Also σ (K ) = F . Let G be those sets F of F such that

0 =∫

XXF dP (64.6.35)

This is true for F ∈K . Now it is clear that G is closed with respect to complements andcountable disjoint unions. It is closed with respect to complements because∫

XXFC dP =∫

X (1−XF)dP =∫

XdP−∫

XXF dP = 0

By Dynkin’s lemma, G = F and so 64.6.35 holds for all F ∈F which requires X = 0.

64.6.2 The Wiener ProcessesRecall the definition of the Wiener process.

Definition 64.6.6 Let W (t) be a stochastic process which has the properties that whenevert1 < t2 < · · ·< tm, the increments {W (ti)−W (ti−1)} are independent and whenever s< t, itfollows W (t)−W (s) is normally distributed with variance t−s and mean 0. Also t→W (t)is Holder continuous with every exponent γ < 1/2, W (0) = 0. This is called a Wienerprocess.

Now in the definition of W above, you begin with a Hilbert space H. There exists aprobability space

(Ω,F̂ ,P

)and a linear mapping W such that

E (W ( f )W (g)) = ( f ,g)

64.6. WIENER PROCESSES, ANOTHER APPROACH 2215which shows that the inverse Fourier transform of v is 0. Thus v = 0. To see this, let y € G,the Schwartz class. Then neglecting troublesome constants in the Fourier transform,o= [wo [,etavonar= [ [, w@elaavo) =v (Fy)Now F~! maps G onto G and so this reduces to[ wdv =0RPfor all y € G. By density of G in Cp (R”) , it follows that the above holds for all yw € Co (R”)and so v=0.It follows that for every B Borel and for every such description of W (h).o= | xzn(wih aPp= [x2 “1 dPJX Fo Wa) aP = |X 2 wnytin)Let .% be sets of the form W(h)~' (B) where B is of the form B, x --- x By, B; open, thisfor some p. Then this is clearly a 7 system because the intersection of any two of them isanother one and0,Q = W(h)'(R?)are both in .%. Also o (.%) = F. Let Y be those sets F of ¥ such that0= | X XpdP (64.6.35)QThis is true for F € %. Now it is clear that Y is closed with respect to complements andcountable disjoint unions. It is closed with respect to complements because[x %caP = [ x 2e)aP= | xar— | x%aP=0Q Q Q QBy Dynkin’s lemma, Y = ¥ and so 64.6.35 holds for all F € ¥ which requires X¥ = 0. JJ64.6.2 The Wiener ProcessesRecall the definition of the Wiener process.Definition 64.6.6 Let W (t) be a stochastic process which has the properties that wheneverth <ty <+++<tym, the increments {W (t;) — W (t;-1)} are independent and whenever s <t, itfollows W (t) —W (s) is normally distributed with variance t — s and mean 0. Also t > W (t)is Holder continuous with every exponent y < 1/2, W(0) =0. This is called a Wienerprocess.Now in the definition of W above, you begin with a Hilbert space H. There exists aprobability space (2, F, P) and a linear mapping W such thatE(W(f)W(g)) =(f,8)