2372 CHAPTER 69. GELFAND TRIPLES

This proves the first claim of the lemma.Consider now the claim that t→ X (t) is weakly continuous. Letting v ∈V,

limt→s

(X (t) ,v) = limt→s⟨X (t) ,v⟩= ⟨X (s) ,v⟩= (X (s) ,v)

Since it was shown that |X (t)| is bounded independent of t, and since V is dense in H, theclaim follows.

Now

−m−1

∑j=0

∣∣X (t j+1)−X (t j)

∣∣2H = |X (tm)|2−|X0|2−

m−1

∑j=0

2∫ t j+1

t j

⟨Y (u) ,X rk (u)⟩du

= |X (tm)|2−|X0|2−2∫ tm

0⟨Y (u) ,X r

k (u)⟩du

Thus, since the partitions are nested, eventually |X (tm)|2 is constant for all k large enoughand the integral term converges to ∫ tm

0⟨Y (u) ,X (u)⟩du

It follows that the term on the left does converge to something. It just remains to considerwhat it does converge to. However, from the equation solved by X ,

X(t j+1

)−X (t j) =

∫ t j+1

t j

Y (u)du

Therefore, this term is dominated by an expression of the form

mk−1

∑j=0

(∫ t j+1

t j

Y (u)du,X(t j+1

)−X (t j)

)

=mk−1

∑j=0

⟨∫ t j+1

t j

Y (u)du,X(t j+1

)−X (t j)

=mk−1

∑j=0

∫ t j+1

t j

⟨Y (u) ,X

(t j+1

)−X (t j)

⟩du

=mk−1

∑j=0

∫ t j+1

t j

⟨Y (u) ,X

(t j+1

)⟩−

mk−1

∑j=0

∫ t j+1

t j

⟨Y (u) ,X (t j)

⟩=

∫ T

0⟨Y (u) ,X r (u)⟩du−

∫ T

0

⟨Y (u) ,X l (u)

⟩du

However, both X r and X l converge to X in K = Lp (0,T,V ). Therefore, this term mustconverge to 0. Passing to a limit, it follows that for all t ∈ D, the desired formula holds.Thus, for such t,

|X (t)|2 = |X0|2 +2∫ t

0⟨Y (u) ,X (u)⟩du

2372 CHAPTER 69. GELFAND TRIPLESThis proves the first claim of the lemma.Consider now the claim that t > X (t) is weakly continuous. Letting v € V,lim (X (7) ,v) = lim (X (1) ,) = (X (s),v) = (X (s),v)Since it was shown that |X (r)| is bounded independent of t, and since V is dense in H, theclaim follows. JjNowm—1 7— LIK (tr) -X (Digj=0mal ti+1X (tm)? —|Xol? — ¥° 2 (Y (u) ,X¢ (u)) dutjj=0IX (im)? —[Xol? —2 f" (¥ (u) XE w)) duThus, since the partitions are nested, eventually |X (tm)|” is constant for all k large enoughand the integral term converges totn[WX w) au0It follows that the term on the left does converge to something. It just remains to considerwhat it does converge to. However, from the equation solved by X,nalX (tj41) —X (tj) = / Y (u)dutjTherefore, this term is dominated by an expression of the form» (/ Y (u)du,X (t:+1) x(n)= ¥ ([ Y (u)du,X (tj+1) -x(t)))meV ptjsyy i (Y (u) .X (ti41) —X (t;)) duj=0 %4im—1 tj m—1 ti41= y | (Y (uw) ,X (ti41)) — xy I (Y (u) ,X (tj)j=0 “Fi[ Ww), X"(w))du- [ (¥(u),X"(u)) duHowever, both X” and X! converge to X in K = L?(0,T,V). Therefore, this term mustconverge to 0. Passing to a limit, it follows that for all t € D, the desired formula holds.Thus, for such f,X= Kol? +2 fw), X (wd