15.1. BASIC INEQUALITIES AND PROPERTIES 405

Proof: Since f is bounded and µ (X) ,λ (Y )< ∞,(∫Y(∫

X| f (x,y)|dµ)pdλ

) 1p

< ∞.

LetJ(y) =

∫X| f (x,y)|dµ .

Note there is no problem in writing this for a.e. y because f is product measurable. Thenby Fubini’s theorem,∫

Y

(∫X| f (x,y)|dµ

)p

dλ =∫

YJ(y)p−1

∫X| f (x,y)|dµ dλ

=∫

X

∫Y

J(y)p−1| f (x,y)|dλ dµ

Now apply Holder’s inequality in the last integral above and recall p−1 = pq . This yields∫

Y

(∫X| f (x,y)|dµ

)p

≤∫

X

(∫Y

J(y)pdλ

) 1q(∫

Y| f (x,y)|pdλ

) 1p

=

(∫Y

J(y)pdλ

) 1q ∫

X

(∫Y| f (x,y)|pdλ

) 1p

=

(∫Y(∫

X| f (x,y)|dµ)pdλ

) 1q ∫

X

(∫Y| f (x,y)|pdλ

) 1p

dµ . (15.1.6)

Therefore, dividing both sides by the first factor in the above expression,(∫Y

(∫X| f (x,y)|dµ

)p

) 1p

≤∫

X

(∫Y| f (x,y)|pdλ

) 1p

dµ . (15.1.7)

Note that 15.1.7 holds even if the first factor of 15.1.6 equals zero. This proves the lemma.Now consider the case where f is not assumed to be bounded and where the measure

spaces are σ finite.

Theorem 15.1.12 Let (X ,S ,µ) and (Y,F ,λ ) be σ -finite measure spaces and let f beproduct measurable. Then the following inequality is valid for p≥ 1.∫

X

(∫Y| f (x,y)|p dλ

) 1p

dµ ≥(∫

Y(∫

X| f (x,y)|dµ)pdλ

) 1p

. (15.1.8)

Proof: Since the two measure spaces are σ finite, there exist measurable sets, Xm andYk such that Xm ⊆ Xm+1 for all m, Yk ⊆ Yk+1 for all k, and µ (Xm) ,λ (Yk)< ∞. Now define

fn (x,y)≡{

f (x,y) if | f (x,y)| ≤ nn if | f (x,y)|> n.

15.1. BASIC INEQUALITIES AND PROPERTIES 405Proof: Since f is bounded and p(X) ,A (Y) < %,(ff, cesyianyran) -_10) = [ Afly)lde.Note there is no problem in writing this for a.e. y because f is product measurable. Thenby Fubini’s theorem,[ (firesovian) aaLet[ror [iresylauaa= ff [soy ree yy|aa dyX JYNow apply Holder’s inequality in the last integral above and recall p— 1 = f. This yieldsLG Irosoilau) a2k (01%) ' (/ rosy) Par) du- ([pora)! [sreL=([fjtreonanrar)” [Cf tesan) a (15.1.6)Therefore, dividing both sides by the first factor in the above expression,(/ (/ f stn aa)’ < | ( [ ironilPaa ) "an (15.1.7)Note that 15.1.7 holds even if the first factor of 15.1.6 equals zero. This proves the lemma.Now consider the case where f is not assumed to be bounded and where the measurespaces are oO finite.IATheorem 15.1.12 Let (X,.%,) and (Y,.F,A) be o-finite measure spaces and let f beproduct measurable. Then the following inequality is valid for p > 1.h (/ yes) aa) 2 (fof rosa ran ) 7 (15.1.8)Proof: Since the two measure spaces are o finite, there exist measurable sets, X,, andY, such that Xj, C Xin41 for all m, Y; C Y¥e41 for all k, and pl (Xin) ,A (Yj) < oe. Now define_{ fle») if [Fey <ninten) = nif |f(x.y)| >.