506 CHAPTER 18. TOPOLOGICAL VECTOR SPACES

Proof: Let F : X → X where X described above.

Fy(t)≡∫ t

0f(s,y(s)+x0)ds

Let B be a bounded set in X . Then |f(s,y(s)+x0)| is bounded for s ∈ [0,T ] if y ∈ B. Say|f(s,y(s)+x0)| ≤CB. Hence F (B) is bounded in X . Also, for y ∈ B,s < t,

|Fy(t)−Fy(s)| ≤∣∣∣∣∫ t

sf(s,y(s)+x0)ds

∣∣∣∣≤CB |t− s|

and so F (B) is pre-compact by the Ascoli Arzela theorem. By the Schaefer fixed pointtheorem, there are two alternatives. Either there are unbounded solutions y to

λF (y) = y

for various λ ∈ (0,1) or for all λ ∈ [0,1] , there is a fixed point for λF. In the first case,there would be unbounded yλ solving

yλ (t) = λ

∫ t

0f(s,yλ (s)+x0)ds

Then let xλ (s)≡ yλ (s)+x0 and you get ∥xλ∥ also unbounded for various λ ∈ (0,1). Theabove implies

xλ (t)−x0 = λ

∫ t

0f(s,xλ (s))ds

so x′λ= λ f(t,xλ ) ,xλ (0) = x0 and these would be unbounded for λ ∈ (0,1) contrary to the

assumption that there exists an estimate for these valid for all λ ∈ (0,1). Hence the firstalternative must hold and hence there is y ∈ X such that

Fy = y

Then letting x(s)≡ y(s)+x0, it follows that

x(t)−x0 =∫ t

0f(s,x(s))ds

and so x is a solution to the differential equation on [0,T ].Note that existence for solutions to 18.5.24 is not assumed, only estimates of possible

solutions. These estimates are called a-priori estimates. Also note this is a global existencetheorem, not a local one for a solution defined on only a small interval.

18.6 A Variational Principle of EkelandDefinition 18.6.1 A function φ : X → (−∞,∞] is called proper if it is not constantly equalto ∞. Here X is assumed to be a complete metric space. The function φ is lower semicon-tinuous if

xn→ x implies φ (x)≤ lim infn→∞

φ (xn)

It is bounded below if there is some constant C such that C ≤ φ (x) for all x.

506 CHAPTER 18. TOPOLOGICAL VECTOR SPACESProof: Let F : X — X where X described above.tFy(t) = [ t(s.y(s)+x0) dsLet B be a bounded set in X. Then |f(s,y (s) +xo)| is bounded for s € [0,T] if y € B. Saylf (s,y (s) +x0)| < Cp. Hence F (B) is bounded in X. Also, for y € B,s <t,|F y(t) —Fy(s)| < <Cpl|t—s|[ t6.9(0) +x0)asand so F (B) is pre-compact by the Ascoli Arzela theorem. By the Schaefer fixed pointtheorem, there are two alternatives. Either there are unbounded solutions y toAF (y)=yfor various A € (0,1) or for all A € [0,1], there is a fixed point for AF. In the first case,there would be unbounded y, solvingy(t) =A [t(s.ya (8) +0)dsThen let xy (s) = yy (s) + xo and you get ||x,|| also unbounded for various A € (0,1). Theabove impliesx, ()—x =A [ tlo.x, (s))asso x = Af(t,x,) ,x, (0) = Xo and these would be unbounded for A € (0, 1) contrary to theassumption that there exists an estimate for these valid for all A € (0,1). Hence the firstalternative must hold and hence there is y € X such thatFy=yThen letting x(s) = y(s) + xo, it follows thatx(1) —x0= ['t(s.x(s))asand so x is a solution to the differential equation on [0,7].Note that existence for solutions to 18.5.24 is not assumed, only estimates of possiblesolutions. These estimates are called a-priori estimates. Also note this is a global existencetheorem, not a local one for a solution defined on only a small interval.18.6 A Variational Principle of EkelandDefinition 18.6.1 A function @ : X — (—°,°9] is called proper if it is not constantly equalto cc, Here X is assumed to be a complete metric space. The function @ is lower semicon-tinuous ifXn — x implies @ (x) < lim inf ¢ (Xn)It is bounded below if there is some constant C such that C < @ (x) for all x.