18.6. A VARIATIONAL PRINCIPLE OF EKELAND 511

The inequality is preserved if x = y. Then let

F (x)≡ {y ̸= x : φ (x)−d (x,y)≥ φ (y)} ̸= /0

by assumption. This is the hypothesis for the Cariste fixed point theorem. Hence thereexists x0 ∈F (x0) = {y ̸= x0 : φ (x0)−d (x0,y)≥ φ (y)} but this cannot happen because youcan’t have x0 ̸= x0. Thus the Ekeland variational principle must hold after all.

18.6.2 A Density ResultThere are several applications of the Ekeland variational principle. For more of them, see[55]. One of these is to show that there is a point where φ

′ is small assuming φ is boundedbelow, lower semicontinuous, and Gateaux differentiable. Here⟨

φ′ (x) ,v

⟩≡ lim

h→0

φ (x+hv)−φ (x)h

, φ′ (x) ∈ X ′

It is sort of an approximate critical point at a point which causes φ to be near the infimum.

Theorem 18.6.4 Let X be a Banach space and φ : X → R be Gateaux differentiable,bounded from below, and lower semicontinuous. Then for every ε > 0 there exists x ∈ Xsuch that

φ (xε)≤ infx∈X

φ (x)+ ε and∥∥φ′ (xε)

∥∥X ′ ≤ ε

Proof: From the Ekeland variational principle with λ = 1, there exists xε such that

φ (xε)≤ φ (x0)≤ infx∈X

φ (x)+ ε

and for all x,φ (xε)< φ (x)+ ε ∥x− xε∥

Then letting x = xε +hv where ∥v∥= 1,

φ (xε +hv)−φ (xε)>−ε |h|

Let h < 0. Then divide by it

φ (xε +hv)−φ (xε)

h< ε

Passing to a limit as h→ 0 yields ⟨φ′ (xε) ,v

⟩≤ ε

Now v was arbitrary with norm 1 and so

sup∥v∥=1

⟨φ′ (xε) ,v

⟩=∥∥φ′ (xε)

∥∥≤ ε

There is another very interesting application of the Ekeland variational principle [55].

18.6. A VARIATIONAL PRINCIPLE OF EKELAND 511The inequality is preserved if x = y. Then letF (x) = {y Ax: (x) -—d(x,y) > O(y)} FOby assumption. This is the hypothesis for the Cariste fixed point theorem. Hence thereexists x9 € F (xo) = {y 4 x0 : O (xo) —d (x0, y) = o (y)} but this cannot happen because youcan’t have x9 # xo. Thus the Ekeland variational principle must hold after all.18.6.2 A Density ResultThere are several applications of the Ekeland variational principle. For more of them, see[55]. One of these is to show that there is a point where @’ is small assuming @ is boundedbelow, lower semicontinuous, and Gateaux differentiable. Here(6" (x) ,v) = lim 22M) — 0)/ x’h—-0 h ONEIt is sort of an approximate critical point at a point which causes @ to be near the infimum.Theorem 18.6.4 Let X be a Banach space and $ : X — R be Gateaux differentiable,bounded from below, and lower semicontinuous. Then for every € > 0 there exists x © Xsuch that0 (xe) < inf 6 (x) +€ and 6" (xe)|| qr SeProof: From the Ekeland variational principle with A = 1, there exists x- such that9 (xe) < o (xo) < inf g (x) +exEXand for all x,9 (Xe) < 0 (x) +€ |x xe]Then letting x = x¢ + hv where ||v|| = 1,0 (te + hv) — 6 (xe) > —e |A|Let h < 0. Then divide by it(xe thy) — 9 (xe)h<_€EPassing to a limit as h — 0 yields(9 (xe) :V) SENow v was arbitrary with norm | and sosup (9! (xe),v) = ||¢’ Ge) ||<eI[p||=1There is another very interesting application of the Ekeland variational principle [55].