526 CHAPTER 19. HILBERT SPACES

which shows Lun→ Lu weakly. Therefore, L(

B(0,r))

is weakly compact because it is thecontinuous image of a compact set. Therefore, it must also be weakly closed because theweak topology is a Hausdorff space. (See Lemma 18.3.2 on Page 493, and so you can applythe separation theorem, Theorem 18.2.5 on Page 486 to obtain a separating functional. Thusif x ̸= y, there exists f ∈ H ′ such that Re f (y)> c > Re f (x) and so taking

2r < min(c−Re f (x) ,Re f (y)− c) ,

B f (x,r)∩B f (y,r) = /0

whereB f (x,r)≡ {y ∈ H : | f (x− y)|< r}

is an example of a basic open set in the weak topology.)Now suppose p /∈ L

(B(0,r)

). Since the set is weakly closed and convex, it follows

by Theorem 18.2.5 and the Riesz representation theorem for Hilbert space that there existsz ∈ H such that

Re(p,z)> c > Re(Lx,z)

for all x ∈ B(0,r). Therefore, p cannot be a strong limit point because if it were, therewould exist xn ∈ B(0,r) such that Lxn → p which would require Re(Lxn,z)→ Re(p,z)which is prevented by the above inequality. This proves the lemma.

Now here is a very interesting result about showing that T1 (U1) = T2 (U2) where Ui isa Hilbert space and Ti ∈L (Ui,H). The situation is as indicated in the diagram.

HT1↗ ↖ T2

U1 U2

The question is whether T1U1 = T2U2.

Theorem 19.2.5 Let Ui, i = 1,2 and H be Hilbert spaces and let Ti ∈L (Ui,H). If thereexists c≥ 0 such that for all x ∈ H

||T ∗1 x||1 ≤ c ||T ∗2 x||2 (19.2.12)

thenT1

(B(0,1)

)⊆ T2

(B(0,c)

)(19.2.13)

and so T1 (U1)⊆ T2 (U2). If ||T ∗1 x||1 = ||T∗x||2 for all x ∈ H, then T1 (U1) = T2 (U2) and in

addition to this, ∣∣∣∣T−11 x

∣∣∣∣1 =

∣∣∣∣T−12 x

∣∣∣∣2 (19.2.14)

for all x ∈ T1 (U1) = T2 (U2). In this theorem, T−1i refers to Definition 19.2.1.

Proof: Consider the first claim. If it is not so, then there exists u0, ||u0||1 ≤ 1 but

T1 (u0) /∈ T2

(B(0,c)

)

526 CHAPTER 19. HILBERT SPACESwhich shows Lu, — Lu weakly. Therefore, L (3 (0, r)) is weakly compact because it is thecontinuous image of a compact set. Therefore, it must also be weakly closed because theweak topology is a Hausdorff space. (See Lemma 18.3.2 on Page 493, and so you can applythe separation theorem, Theorem 18.2.5 on Page 486 to obtain a separating functional. Thusif x 4 y, there exists f € H’ such that Re f(y) > c > Re f (x) and so taking2r < min(c—Ref (x),Ref(y)—c),By (x,r) Bz (y,7) = 0whereBr (xr) ={y€H:|f(w—y)| <r}is an example of a basic open set in the weak topology.)Now suppose p ¢ L (B (0, ")) . Since the set is weakly closed and convex, it followsby Theorem 18.2.5 and the Riesz representation theorem for Hilbert space that there existsz © A such thatRe(p,z) >c > Re (Lx, z)for all x € B(0,r). Therefore, p cannot be a strong limit point because if it were, therewould exist x, € B(0,r) such that Lx, — p which would require Re (Lx,,z) > Re(p,z)which is prevented by the above inequality. This proves the lemma.Now here is a very interesting result about showing that T, (U;) = T) (U2) where U; isa Hilbert space and 7; € & (U;,H). The situation is as indicated in the diagram.HT / \ ThU; U2The question is whether 7) U; = 77U2.Theorem 19.2.5 Let U;,i = 1,2 and H be Hilbert spaces and let T; © & (U;,H). If thereexists c > 0 such that for all x € HTih Sell (19.2.12)thenT; (200.0) CD (20.0) (19.2.13)and so T, (U,) © Tp (U2). If ||T;*x||, = ||T*x||2 for all x € H, then T,; (U,) = Tz (U2) and inaddition to this,Trl = [tell (19.2.14)for all x € T; (U,) = Th (U2). In this theorem, T, | refers to Definition 19.2.1.Proof: Consider the first claim. If it is not so, then there exists ug, ||uo||, <1 butT; (uo) € Tr (200.0)