542 CHAPTER 19. HILBERT SPACES

Proof: Using 19.7.31∣∣∣∣∣((

A−n

∑k=1

λ kuk⊗uk

)x,y

)∣∣∣∣∣=∣∣∣∣∣(

Ax−n

∑k=1

λ k (x,uk)uk,y

)∣∣∣∣∣=

∣∣∣∣∣(

∑k=n

λ k (x,uk)uk,y

)∣∣∣∣∣=∣∣∣∣∣ ∞

∑k=n

λ k (x,uk)(uk,y)

∣∣∣∣∣≤ |λ n|

(∞

∑k=n|(x,uk)|2

)1/2(∞

∑k=n|(y,uk)|2

)1/2

≤ |λ n|∥x∥∥y∥

It follows ∥∥∥∥∥(

A−n

∑k=1

λ kuk⊗uk

)(x)

∥∥∥∥∥≤ |λ n|∥x∥

Lemma 19.7.4 If Vλ is the eigenspace for λ ̸= 0 and B : Vλ →Vλ is a compact self adjointoperator, then Vλ must be finite dimensional.

Proof: This follows from the above theorem because it gives a sequence of eigenvalueson restrictions of B to subspaces with λ k ↓ 0. Hence, eventually λ n = 0 because there isno other eigenvalue in Vλ than λ . Hence there can be no eigenvector on Vλ for λ = 0 andspan(u1, · · · ,un) =Vλ = A(Vλ ) for some n.

Corollary 19.7.5 Let A be a compact self adjoint operator defined on a separable Hilbertspace, H. Then there exists a countable set of eigenvalues, {λ i} and an orthonormal set ofeigenvectors, ui satisfying

Avi = λ ivi,∥ui∥= 1, (19.7.34)

span({vi}∞

i=1) is dense in H. (19.7.35)

Furthermore, if λ i ̸= 0, the space, Vλ i ≡ {x ∈ H : Ax = λ ix} is finite dimensional.

Proof: Let B be the restriction of A to Vλ i . Thus B is a compact self adjoint operatorwhich maps Vλ to Vλ and has only one eigenvalue λ i on Vλ i . By Lemma 19.7.4, Vλ isfinite dimensional. As to the density of some span({vi}∞

i=1) in H, in the proof of the above

theorem, let W ≡ span({ui})⊥

. By Theorem 19.5.2, there is a maximal orthonormal setof vectors, {wi}∞

i=1 whose span is dense in W . There are only countably many of thesesince the space H is separable. As shown in the proof of the above theorem, Aw = 0 for allw ∈W . Let {vi}∞

i=1 = {ui}∞

i=1∪{wi}∞

i=1.Note the last claim of this corollary about Vλ being finite dimensional if λ ̸= 0 holds

independent of the separability of H.Suppose λ /∈ {λ k}∞

k=1 , the eigenvalues of A, and λ ̸= 0. Then the above formula for A,19.7.31, yields an interesting formula for (A−λ I)−1. Note first that since limn→∞ λ n = 0,it follows that λ

2n/(λ n−λ )2 must be bounded, say by a positive constant, M.

542 CHAPTER 19. HILBERT SPACESProof: Using 19.7.31| ( (4 —) Agu om] vs)=[as y Ak (x, Ux) wr)k=1= (Zac nn) = Ye (xsue) (ey)k=n k=nco W277 . 1/2< nl (Sm (Elon) < |An| |l-! [LyIt follows<|An\|lxl] 0| (4 2am ou) (x)k=1Lemma 19.7.4 /f V4, is the eigenspace for A #0 and B : V;, — V;, is a compact self adjointoperator, then Vy must be finite dimensional.Proof: This follows from the above theorem because it gives a sequence of eigenvalueson restrictions of B to subspaces with A; | 0. Hence, eventually 2,, = 0 because there isno other eigenvalue in V, than 2. Hence there can be no eigenvector on V, for A = 0 andspan (u1,°++ ,Un) =V, =A(V,) for somen.Corollary 19.7.5 Let A be a compact self adjoint operator defined on a separable Hilbertspace, H. Then there exists a countable set of eigenvalues, {A;} and an orthonormal set ofeigenvectors, u; SatisfyingAv; = Avi, |u| = 1, (19.7.34)span ({v;};-,) is dense in H. (19.7.35)Furthermore, if 4; 4 0, the space, Vi, = {x € H : Ax = Ax} is finite dimensional.Proof: Let B be the restriction of A to V,,. Thus B is a compact self adjoint operatorwhich maps V, to V, and has only one eigenvalue A; on V,,. By Lemma 19.7.4, Vy isfinite dimensional. As to the density of some span ({v;};_,) in H, in the proof of the abovetheorem, let W = span ({ui}) By Theorem 19.5.2, there is a maximal orthonormal setof vectors, {w;};, whose span is dense in W. There are only countably many of thesesince the space H is separable. As shown in the proof of the above theorem, Aw = 0 for allw ew. Let {vi}, = {uit U {iti WlNote the last claim of this corollary about V, being finite dimensional if A 4 0 holdsindependent of the separability of H.Suppose A ¢ {A;},_, , the eigenvalues of A, and A # 0. Then the above formula for A,19.7.31, yields an interesting formula for (A — AI yt Note first that since lim,_,..A, = 0,it follows that A? /(A, —A)* must be bounded, say by a positive constant, M.