654 CHAPTER 21. THE BOCHNER INTEGRAL

Proof: Theorem 21.2.4 shows∫

Ω∥x(s)∥dµ < ∞ and that the definition of the integral

is well defined.It remains to verify the triangle inequality on Bochner integral functions and the claim

about passing a continuous linear functional inside the integral. First of all, consider thetriangle inequality. From Lemma 21.1.2, there is a sequence of simple functions {yn}satisfying 21.2.3 and converging to x pointwise such that also ∥yn (s)∥ ≤ 2∥x(s)∥. Thus,∥∥∥∥∫

x(s)dµ

∥∥∥∥≡ limn→∞

∥∥∥∥∫Ω

yn (s)dµ

∥∥∥∥≤ limn→∞

∫Ω

∥yn (s)∥dµ =∫

∥x(s)∥dµ

the last step coming from the dominated convergence theorem since ∥yn (s)∥ ≤ 2∥x(s)∥and ∥yn (s)∥→ ∥x(s)∥ for each s. This shows the triangle inequality.

From Definition 21.2.1 and Theorem 21.2.4 and {yn} being the approximating sequencedescribed there,

f(∫

yndµ

)=∫

f (yn)dµ.

Thus,

f(∫

xdµ

)= lim

n→∞f(∫

yndµ

)= lim

n→∞

∫Ω

f (yn)dµ =∫

f (x)dµ,

the last equation holding from the dominated convergence theorem (| f (yn)| ≤ ∥ f∥∥yn∥ ≤2∥ f∥∥x∥). This shows 21.2.5.

It remains to verify 21.2.7. Let f ∈ X ′. Then from 21.2.5

f(∫

(ax(s)+by(s))dµ

)=

∫Ω

(a f (x(s))+b f (y(s)))dµ

= a∫

f (x(s))dµ +b∫

f (y(s))dµ

= f(

a∫

x(s)dµ +b∫

y(s)dµ

).

Since X ′ separates the points of X ,it follows∫Ω

(ax(s)+by(s))dµ = a∫

x(s)dµ +b∫

y(s)dµ

and this proves 21.2.7.A similar result is the following corollary.

Corollary 21.2.6 Let an X valued function x be Bochner integrable and let L ∈L (X ,Y )where Y is another Banach space. Then Lx is a Y valued Bochner integrable function and

L(∫

x(s)dµ

)=∫

Lx(s)dµ

Proof: From Theorem 21.2.4 there is a sequence of simple functions {yn} having theproperties listed in that theorem. Then consider {Lyn} which converges pointwise to Lx.Since L is continuous and linear,∫

∥Lyn−Lx∥Y dµ ≤ ∥L∥∫

∥yn− x∥X dµ

654 CHAPTER 21. THE BOCHNER INTEGRALProof: Theorem 21.2.4 shows fo ||x(s)|| du < ce and that the definition of the integralis well defined.It remains to verify the triangle inequality on Bochner integral functions and the claimabout passing a continuous linear functional inside the integral. First of all, consider thetriangle inequality. From Lemma 21.1.2, there is a sequence of simple functions {y,}satisfying 21.2.3 and converging to x pointwise such that also ||y, (s)|| <2 ||x(s)||. Thus,[xo ja = fim [on ()du] < tim [Ia ian = [ ixcoyiauQ n—yoothe last step coming from the dominated convergence theorem since ||y, (s)|| <2 ||x(s)||and ||y, (s)|| — ||x(s)|| for each s. This shows the triangle inequality.From Definition 21.2.1 and Theorem 21.2.4 and {y, } being the approximating sequencedescribed there,( a) = [ f (yn) duJQ. JQ(fan) tim ¢ ( [yds = lim | ron)du= [ f@)au,the last equation holding from the dominated convergence theorem (|f (yn)| < || fl [yal] <2|| Fl |x|). This shows 21.2.5,It remains to verify 21.2.7. Let f € X’. Then from 21.2.5F( [tavis)+evioyan) = [ (artes) ref ))anaf Flas )du+b [ Fy(s)= ‘(foo o),Since X’ separates the points of X ,it follows[ (a) +by(9))du =a [ x(s)du+o f[ v(s)anQ Q Qand this proves 21.2.7. fjA similar result is the following corollary.Thus,Corollary 21.2.6 Let an X valued function x be Bochner integrable and let LE & (X,Y)where Y is another Banach space. Then Lx is a Y valued Bochner integrable function andL( [x(an) = [tx(s)auProof: From Theorem 21.2.4 there is a sequence of simple functions {y, } having theproperties listed in that theorem. Then consider {Ly, } which converges pointwise to Lx.Since L is continuous and linear,[en —eally ae < itl) [lyn ally aeQ Q