786 CHAPTER 23. DEGREE THEORY

6. d (·,Ω,y) is defined and constant on{g ∈C

(Ω;Rn) : ||g− f||

∞< r}

where r = dist(y, f(∂Ω)).

7. d (f,Ω, ·) is constant on every connected component of Rn \ f(∂Ω).

8. d (g,Ω,y) = d (f,Ω,y) if g|∂Ω

= f|∂Ω

.

Theorem 23.8.1 Let Ω be a bounded open set in Rn and let f ∈ C(Ω̄;Rn

m)

where Rnm =

{x ∈ Rn : xk = 0 for k > m} . Thus x concludes with a column of n−m zeros. Let y ∈ Rnm \

(id−f)(∂Ω) . Then d (id−f,Ω,y) = d((id−f) |

Ω∩Rnm,Ω∩Rn

m,y).

Proof: To save space, let g = id−f. Then there is no loss of generality in assuming atthe outset that y is a regular value for g. Indeed, everything above was reduced to this case.Then for x ∈ g−1 (y) and letting xm be the first m variables for x,

Dg(x) =(

Dxmg(x) ∗0 In−m

)Then it follows that

0 ̸= det(Dg(x)) = det(

Dxmg(x) ∗0 In−m

)= det

(Dxmg(x) 0

0 In−m

)= det(Dxmg(x))

This last is just the determinant of the derivative of the function which results from restrict-ing g to the first m variables. Now y ∈ Rn

m and f also is given to have values in Rnm so

if g(x) = y, then you have x− f(x) = y which requires x ∈ Rnm also. Therefore, g−1 (y)

consists of points in Rnm only. Thus, y is also a regular value of the function which results

from restricting g to Rnm∩Ω.

d (id−f,Ω,y) = d (g,Ω,y)

= ∑x∈g−1(y)

sign(det(Dg(x)))

= ∑x∈g−1(y)

sign(det(Dxmg(x)))≡ d((id−f) |

Ω∩Rnm,Ω∩Rn

m,y)

Recall that for g ∈C2(Ω̄;Rn

),

d (g,Ω,y)≡ limε→0

∫Ω

φ ε (g(x)−y)detDg(x)dx

In fact, it can be shown that the degree is unique based on its Properties, 1,2,5 above. Itinvolves reducing to linear maps and then some complicated arguments involving linear

786 CHAPTER 23. DEGREE THEORY6. d(-,Q,y) is defined and constant on{g€C(Q;R") : ||g—fl|.. <r}where r = dist (y,f(0Q)).7. d(f,Q,-) is constant on every connected component of R” \f (dQ).8. d(g,Q,y) =d(f,,y) if glao =flao-Theorem 23.8.1 Let Q be a bounded open set in R" and let £ € C (Q;RY,) where Rt, ={x € R" : x, =0 fork > m}. Thus x concludes with a column of n—™m zeros. Let y € R', \(id -f) (9Q) . Then d (id -£,Q,y) =d ((ia -f) lonpe 2 OR %,,¥) ;Proof: To save space, let g = id—f. Then there is no loss of generality in assuming atthe outset that y is a regular value for g. Indeed, everything above was reduced to this case.Then for x € g~! (y) and letting x, be the first m variables for x,Dg(x) = ( Pink *) i,» )Then it follows that0 F det(Da(s)) =aet( PB * )In—m= det ( Pont (x) iL. ) = det (Dx, 8 (X))This last is just the determinant of the derivative of the function which results from restrict-ing g to the first m variables. Now y € Rj, and f also is given to have values in R’, soif g(x) = y, then you have x —f(x) = y which requires x € R”, also. Therefore, g~! (y)consists of points in Ri, only. Thus, y is also a regular value of the function which resultsfrom restricting g to RQ.= J sign (det (Dg (x)))xeg | (y)Y sign (det(Ds,,8(x))) =d ((id—f) [omy QORKy) Olxeg-'(y)Recall that for g € C? (Q;R”),d(g,Q,y ) = lim |, 6. (g y) det Dg (x) dxIn fact, it can be shown that the degree is unique based on its Properties, 1,2,5 above. Itinvolves reducing to linear maps and then some complicated arguments involving linear