25.2. DUALITY MAPS 839

if y = αx for α ̸= 1.Thus the desired result holds in the case that one vector is a multiple of the other. The

other case is that neither vector is a multiple of the other. Thus, in particular, x/∥x∥ ̸=y/∥y∥ , and in this case, it follows from 25.2.10

⟨Fx−Fy,x− y⟩= ∥x∥p +∥y∥p−⟨Fx,y⟩−⟨Fy,x⟩

> ∥x∥p +∥y∥p−∥x∥p−1 ∥y∥−∥y∥p−1 ∥x∥

≥ ∥x∥p +∥y∥p−(∥x∥p

p′+∥y∥p

p

)−(∥y∥p

p′+∥x∥p

p

)= 0

Thus F is strictly monotone as claimed.Another useful observation about duality maps for p = 2 is that

∥∥F−1y∗∥∥

V = ∥y∗∥V ′ .This is because

∥y∗∥V ′ =∥∥FF−1y∗

∥∥V ′ =

∥∥F−1y∗∥∥

V

also from similar reasoning,⟨y∗,F−1y∗

⟩=⟨FF−1y∗,F−1y∗

⟩=∥∥F−1y∗

∥∥2V = ∥y∗∥2

V ′

You can give specific inequalities in certain cases. Here is a nice little inequality whichwill allow this.

Theorem 25.2.8 Let p≥ 2 then for x,y ∈ Rn,(|x|p−2 x−|y|p−2 y,x−y

)≥ 1

2p−1 |x−y|p (*)

Proof: We have (x,y) = 12

(|x|2 + |y|2−|x−y|2

). Consider the following.

12

(|x|p−2 + |y|p−2

|x−y|p−2

)|x−y|p + 1

2

(|x|p−2−|y|p−2

)(|x|2−|y|2

)multiplying this out gives

12

(|x|p−2 + |y|p−2

)(|x|2 + |y|2−2(x,y)

)+

12

(|x|p−|x|2 |y|p−2 + |y|p−|x|p−2 |y|2

)thus this yields

12

[|x|p + |y|p−2 |x|2 + |x|p−2 |y|2 + |y|p−

(2(x,y) |x|p−2 +2(x,y) |y|p−2

)]+

12

(|x|p + |y|p−

(|x|2 |y|p−2 + |x|p−2 |y|2

))It simplifies to

|x|p + |y|p−2(x,y)(|x|p−2 + |y|p−2

)

25.2. DUALITY MAPS 839ify=axforaF¥l.Thus the desired result holds in the case that one vector is a multiple of the other. Theother case is that neither vector is a multiple of the other. Thus, in particular, x/ ||x|| 4y/ ||y||, and in this case, it follows from 25.2.10(Fx—Fy,x—y) = ||x||? + |ly||? — x,y) — (Fy,x)-1 -1> lll]? + [yl = fell? Ill] = IP elIl? 2) (bt. el> Hall? +” ( PBI) _ (bir Ie) 9P P P PThus F is strictly monotone as claimed. §jAnother useful observation about duality maps for p = 2 is that ||F~y* lly = |ly*lly.This is becauseIe = FE = Eyalso from similar reasoning,(Fly) = (FF ty Fo ly*) = JPY" fy = lb" lhYou can give specific inequalities in certain cases. Here is a nice little inequality whichwill allow this.Theorem 25.2.8 Let p > 2 then for x,y € R",1Qp-1(Ixl??x— yl? 2y,x—y) > 5 x—yl? (*)Proof: We have (x,y) = 5 (Ix!? + ly)? — x—yl*) . Consider the following.Lf xl? > + ly? 1 2 ~2 2.2; (eet x—yl? + 5 (xl? —[yl?*) (Ix? — Il)multiplying this out gives5 (Ix? + Ly?) (xl? + yl? -20c,9)) + 5 (xl? — IP iy? + yl? — xl?)thus this yields5 [Ii + byl? PsP + x? Ly + yl? — (203.9) bel? +29) Ly?)+5 (|x!? + Iyl? — (|x? y? 2+ 1x12 iy?)It simplifies toIx!” + lyl? —2(x,y) (Isl? ? + Iyl?*)