25.3. PENALIZATON AND PROJECTION OPERATORS 841

25.3 Penalizaton And Projection OperatorsIn this section, X will be a reflexive Banach space such that X , X ′ has a strictly convexnorm. Let K be a closed convex set in X . Then the following lemma is obtained.

Lemma 25.3.1 Let K be closed and convex nonempty subset of X a reflexive Banach spacewhich has strictly convex norm. Then there exists a projection map P such that Px ∈ K andfor all y ∈ K,

∥y− x∥ ≥ ∥x−Px∥

Proof: Let {yn} be a minimizing sequence for y→∥y− x∥ for y ∈ K. Thus

d ≡ inf{∥y− x∥ : y ∈ K}= limn→∞∥yn− x∥

Then obviously {yn} is bounded. Hence there is a subsequence, still denoted by n such thatyn→ w ∈ K. Then

∥w− x∥ ≤ lim infn→∞∥yn− x∥= d

How many closest points to x are there? Suppose w1 is another one. Then∥∥∥∥w1 +w2− x∥∥∥∥= ∥∥∥∥w1− x+w− x

2

∥∥∥∥< ∥∥∥∥w1− x2

∥∥∥∥+∥∥∥∥w− x2

∥∥∥∥= d

contradicting the assumption that both w,w1 are closest points to x. Therefore, Px consistsof a single point.

Denote by F the duality map such that ⟨Fx,x⟩ = ∥x∥2. This is described earlier butthere is also a very nice treatment which is somewhat different in [13]. Everything can begeneralized and is in [91] but here I will only consider this case. First here is a useful result.

Proposition 25.3.2 Let F be the duality map just described. Let φ (x)≡ ∥x∥2

2 . Then F (x) =∂φ (x) .

Proof: This follows from

⟨Fx,y− x⟩ ≤ ⟨Fx,y⟩−⟨Fx,x⟩ ≤ ⟨Fx,x⟩1/2 ⟨Fy,y⟩1/2−⟨Fx,x⟩

≤ ⟨Fy,y⟩2− ⟨Fx,x⟩

2=∥y∥2

2− ∥x∥

2

2.

Next is a really nice result about the characterization of Px in terms of F .

Proposition 25.3.3 Let K be a nonempty closed convex set in X a reflexive Banach spacein which both X ,X ′ have strictly convex norms. Then w ∈ K is equal to Px if and only if

⟨F (x−w) ,y−w⟩ ≤ 0

for every y ∈ K.

25.3. PENALIZATON AND PROJECTION OPERATORS 84125.3. Penalizaton And Projection OperatorsIn this section, X will be a reflexive Banach space such that X, X’ has a strictly convexnorm. Let K be a closed convex set in X. Then the following lemma is obtained.Lemma 25.3.1 Let K be closed and convex nonempty subset of X a reflexive Banach spacewhich has strictly convex norm. Then there exists a projection map P such that Px € K andforally € K,Ily —x|| 2 |]x— P|Proof: Let {y, } be a minimizing sequence for y > ||y —x|| for y € K. Thusd= inf{||y—x|] :y € K} = lim ||yn —x|n-ooThen obviously {y, } is bounded. Hence there is a subsequence, still denoted by n such thatYn + w EK. Then||w —x|| < lim inf ||y, —x|| =dn—yooHow many closest points to x are there? Suppose w, is another one. Then< |contradicting the assumption that both w, w, are closest points to x. Therefore, Px consistsof asingle point. JDenote by F the duality map such that (Fx,x) = ||x||?.. This is described earlier butthere is also a very nice treatment which is somewhat different in [13]. Everything can begeneralized and is in [91] but here I will only consider this case. First here is a useful result.wy —-x+w-x2Wi —-xX2Ww-xX=d2wi +w— xi) =2‘|2Proposition 25.3.2 Let F be the duality map just described. Let @ (x) = ll Then F (x) =2O@ (x).Proof: This follows from(Fx,y—x) < (Fx,y) —(Fx,x) < (Fx,x)!/? (Fy,y)!/? — (Fx,x)2 2(Fy,y) — (Fx,x) _ llyllF _ lll<~ 2 2 2 2ae |Next is a really nice result about the characterization of Px in terms of F’.Proposition 25.3.3 Let K be a nonempty closed convex set in X a reflexive Banach spacein which both X ,X' have strictly convex norms. Then w € K is equal to Px if and only if(F (x—w),y—w) <0for every y EK.