27.1. BASIC THEORY 979

This establishes the first part of the proposition.Next consider the claim that LA (Ω) is always a vector space. First note KA (Ω) is

always convex due to convexity of A. Let λu,αv ∈ LA (Ω) where u,v ∈ KA (Ω) and let a,bbe scalars in F. Then

aλu+bαv = |aλ |ωu+ |bα|θv

where |ω|= |θ |= 1. Then

= (|aλ |+ |bα|)(|aλ |ωu+ |bα|θv|aλ |+ |bα|

)which exhibits aλu + bαv as a multiple of a convex combination of two elements ofKA (Ω) ,ωu and θv. Thus LA (Ω) is closed with respect to linear combinations. This showsit is a vector space. This proves the proposition.

The following norm for LA (Ω) is due to Luxemburg [94]. You might compare this tothe definition of a Minkowski functional. The definition of LA (Ω) above was cooked up sothat the following norm does make sense.

Definition 27.1.6 Define

||u||A = ||u||A,Ω ≡ inf{

t > 0 :∫

A(|u(x)|

t

)dµ ≤ 1

}.

If two functions of LA (Ω) are equal a.e. they are considered to be the same in the usualway.

Proposition 27.1.7 The number defined in Definition 27.1.6 is a norm on LA (Ω) . Also, ifΩ1 ⊆Ω, then

||u||A,Ω1≤ ||u||A,Ω .

Proof: Clearly ||u||A≥ 0. Is ||u||A finite for u∈ LA (Ω)? Let u∈ LA (Ω) so u= λv wherev ∈ KA (Ω) . Then for s > 0∫

A(|u|

s |λ |

)dµ =

∫Ω

A(|v|s

)dµ < ∞

whenever s > 1. Therefore, from the dominated convergence theorem, if s is large enough,∫Ω

A(|u|

s |λ |

)dµ ≤ 1

and this shows there are values of t > 0 such that∫Ω

A(|u(x)|

t

)dµ ≤ 1.

Thus ||u||A is finite as hoped.

27.1. BASIC THEORY 979This establishes the first part of the proposition.Next consider the claim that L,4(Q) is always a vector space. First note K,4 (Q) isalways convex due to convexity of A. Let Au, av € La (Q) where u,v € K, (Q) and let a,bbe scalars in F. Thenadu-+ bav = |aa| aut |ba| Avwhere |@| = |@| = 1. Thenak| mu+|ba| @v= (|aA| + |bal) (“ore|aa| + |ba|which exhibits aAu + bav as a multiple of a convex combination of two elements ofK, (Q), @u and Ov. Thus Ly (Q) is closed with respect to linear combinations. This showsit is a vector space. This proves the proposition.The following norm for L, (Q) is due to Luxemburg [94]. You might compare this tothe definition of a Minkowski functional. The definition of L4 (Q) above was cooked up sothat the following norm does make sense.Definition 27.1.6 Definelal = lll, =int{>0: [a (eer) du < i}.If two functions of L4 (Q) are equal a.e. they are considered to be the same in the usualway.Proposition 27.1.7 The number defined in Definition 27.1.6 is a norm on L, (Q). Also, ifQ, CQ, thenlI4llao, S lellaa-Proof: Clearly ||u||, > 0. Is ||u||, finite for u € Ly (Q)? Let u € Ly (Q) sou = Av wherev € K,4(Q). Then for s > 0LaCie baawhenever s > 1. Therefore, from the dominated convergence theorem, if s is large enough,|u| )A(—~ |du<lI, (Sa HSand this shows there are values of t > 0 such that[a(M2) aneThus ||u||, is finite as hoped.