444 CHAPTER 16. HAUSDORFF MEASURE

H and has compact support contained in W . Then let φ δ be a mollifier and let h ≡ g ∗φ δ

for δ small enough that K ≺ h≺V. Thus

0 =∫

f hdx =∫

Kf dx+

∫V\K

f hdx≥ εmp (K)− ε4−1mp (Em)

≥ ε(mp (Em)−4−1mp (Em)

)− ε4−1mp (Em)≥ 2−1

εmp(Em).

Therefore, mp (Em) = 0, a contradiction. Thus mp (E) ≤ ∑∞m=1 mp (Em) = 0 and so, since

ε > 0 is arbitrary, mp ({x : f (x)> 0}) = 0. Similarly m({x : f (x)< 0}) = 0. If f is com-plex valued, the above applies to the real and imaginary parts. ■

Example: The space L1loc (Ω) may be considered as a subset of D∗ (Ω) as follows.

f (φ) ≡∫

Ωf (x)φ (x)dx for all φ ∈ C∞

c (Ω). Recall that f ∈ L1loc (Ω) if f XK ∈ L1 (Ω)

whenever K is compact.This is well defined thanks to Lemma 16.4.2.Example: δ x ∈D∗ (Ω) where δx (φ)≡ φ (x).It will be observed from the above two examples and a little thought that D∗ (Ω) is

truly enormous. We shall define the derivative of a distribution in such a way that it agreeswith the usual notion of a derivative on those distributions which are also continuouslydifferentiable functions. With this in mind, let f be the restriction to the open set Ω of asmooth function defined on Rp. Then Dxi f makes sense and for φ ∈C∞

c (Ω)

Dxi f (φ)≡∫

Dxi f (x)φ (x)dx =−∫

f Dxiφdx =− f (Dxiφ).

Motivated by this, here is the definition of a weak derivative.

Definition 16.4.3 For T ∈D∗ (Ω) ,DxiT (φ)≡−T (Dxiφ).

One can continue taking derivatives indefinitely. Thus, Dxix j T ≡ Dxi

(Dx j T

)and it is

clear that all mixed partial derivatives are equal because this holds for the functions inC∞

c (Ω). Thus one can differentiate virtually anything, even functions that may be discon-tinuous everywhere. However the notion of “derivative” is very weak, hence the name,“weak derivatives”.

Example: Let Ω = R and let H (x)≡{

1 if x≥ 0,0 if x < 0. Then

DH (φ) =−∫

H (x)φ′ (x)dx = φ (0) = δ 0(φ).

Note that in this example, DH is not a function.What happens when D f is a function?

Theorem 16.4.4 Let Ω = (a,b) and suppose that f and D f are both in L1 (a,b).Then f is equal to a continuous function a.e., still denoted by f and f (x) = f (a) +∫ x

a D f (t)dt.

Proof: Consider f −∫ (·)

a D f (t)dt ≡ T. Is this function equal to some constant a.e.? Letφ ∈C∞

c (a,b) . By Fubini’s theorem, DT (φ)≡∫ b

a

(f (x)−

∫ x

aD f (t)dt

)φ′ (x)dx =

∫ b

af (x)φ

′ (x)dx−∫ b

a

∫ x

aD f (t)φ

′ (x)dtdx

444 CHAPTER 16. HAUSDORFF MEASUREH and has compact support contained in W. Then let @5 be a mollifier and let h = g* @5for 6 small enough that K < h < V. Thus0= / fhdx = I fdx+ / ip {hls emp (K)— e4' ny (Em)> € (mp (Em) — 4°! mp (Em)) — €47 |p (Em) > 27 emp (Em).Therefore, my (Em) = 0, a contradiction. Thus mp (E) < ¥7_1 mp (Em) = 0 and so, since€ > Ois arbitrary, m, ({x : f (x) > 0}) =0. Similarly m({x : f (a) < 0}) =O. If f is com-plex valued, the above applies to the real and imaginary parts.Example: The space L/,.(Q) may be considered as a subset of Z* (Q) as follows.f (0) = Jof (x) 0 (x) dx for all @ € C2 (Q). Recall that f € Lj, (Q) if f 2x € L' (Q)whenever K is compact.This is well defined thanks to Lemma 16.4.2.Example: 6, € Y* (Q) where 6, (¢) = @ (a).It will be observed from the above two examples and a little thought that Y* (Q) istruly enormous. We shall define the derivative of a distribution in such a way that it agreeswith the usual notion of a derivative on those distributions which are also continuouslydifferentiable functions. With this in mind, let f be the restriction to the open set Q of asmooth function defined on R?. Then D,, f makes sense and for @ € C? (Q)0)= [rte =~ [ fD.,6dx=—f (Dy).Motivated by this, here is the definition of a weak derivative.Definition 16.4.3 For T < 9 (Q),D,,T (¢) =—T (D,,).One can continue taking derivatives indefinitely. Thus, D,,.,T = Dy; (Dy,T) and it isclear that all mixed partial derivatives are equal because this holds for the functions inCe (Q). Thus one can differentiate virtually anything, even functions that may be discon-tinuous everywhere. However the notion of “derivative” is very weak, hence the name,“weak derivatives”.if x >Example: Let Q = R and let H (x) = { oreo Then- [ HO) ¢' (x) dx = 6 (0) = 50(¢).Note that in this example, DH is not a function.What happens when Df is a function?Theorem 16.4.4 Let Q = (a,b) and suppose that f and Df are both in L' (a,b).Then f is equal to a continuous function a.e., still denoted by f and f (x) = f(a)+Ja Df (t) dtProof: Consider f — ©) Df (t)dt =T. Is this function equal to some constant a.e.? Let € Ce (a,b) . By Fubini’s theorem, DT (¢) =[ (ro i ‘ps(at) ow ae= [pepe war [° [Ds 6' waar