468 CHAPTER 17. THE AREA FORMULA

17.7 Integration and the DegreeThere is a very interesting application of the degree to integration. I saw something like it in[20]. I want to consider the case where h :Rn→Rn is only Lipschitz continuous, vanishingoutside a bounded set. In the following proposition, let φ ε be a symmetric nonnegativemollifier,

φ ε (x)≡1εn φ

(xε

),sptφ ⊆ B(0,1) .

Ω will be a bounded open set. By Rademacher’s theorem, h satisfies Dh(x) exists a.e.If U is a bounded open set, limm→∞ D(h∗ψm) = limm→∞ Dh∗ψm = Dh in L1 (U ;Rn×n)where ψm is a mollifier. Thus a subsequence converges a.e.

Now recall the definition of the degree.

Definition 17.7.1 Let Ω be a bounded open set in Rp and let f : Ω→ Rp be con-tinuous. Let y /∈ f (∂Ω) . Then the degree is defined as follows: Let g be infinitely differ-entiable,

∥f −g∥∞,Ω < δ ≡ dist(f (∂Ω) ,y) ,

and y is a regular value of g.Then y /∈ g (∂Ω) and we define

d (f,Ω,y)≡∑{

sgn(det(Dg (x))) : x ∈ g−1 (y) ,x ∈Ω}

where the sum is finite by Lemma 15.1.5, defined to equal 0 if g−1 (y) is empty.

Also recall the fundamental integral identity.

Lemma 17.7.2 Let y /∈ g (∂Ω) for g ∈C∞(Ω;Rp

). Also suppose y is a regular value

of g. Then for all positive ε small enough,∫Ω

φ ε (g (x)−y)detDg (x)dx = ∑{

sgn(detDg (x)) : x ∈ g−1 (y)}

The sum is the definition of the degree for g as described. There was also an importantidentity about homotopy Lemma 15.1.13 which includes the following.

Lemma 17.7.3 If h is in C∞(Ω× [a,b] ,Rp

), and 0 /∈ h(∂Ω× [a,b]) then for 0 < ε <

dist(0,h(∂Ω× [a,b])), t→∫

Ωφ ε (h(x, t))detD1h(x, t)dx is constant for t ∈ [a,b].

Lethm in what follows beh∗ψm forh continuous and ψm a mollifier. Eventuallyhwillbe Lipschitz continuous. Let y ∈ h(∂Ω)C there is a ball B(y,δ ) such that d (h,Ω,y) =d (hm,Ω, ŷ) for all m large enough and ŷ ∈ B(y,δ ) . This follows from the properties ofthe degree. Also, from a use of Lemma 17.7.2, this lemma gives

d (hm,Ω,z) =∫

φ ε (hm (x)−z)det(Dhm (x))dx

for all z ∈ B(y,δ ) for sufficiently small ε . Now let f ∈Cc (B(y,δ )) . Then∫f (z)d (hm,Ω,z)dz =

∫f (z)

∫Ω

φ ε (hm (x)−z)det(Dhm (x))dxdz

=∫

det(Dhm (x))∫

f (z)φ ε (hm (x)−z)dzdx

=∫

f (z)∫

det(Dhm (x))φ ε (hm (x)−z)dxdz

468 CHAPTER 17. THE AREA FORMULA17.7 Integration and the DegreeThere is a very interesting application of the degree to integration. I saw something like it in[20]. I want to consider the case where h : R” — R” is only Lipschitz continuous, vanishingoutside a bounded set. In the following proposition, let 6, be a symmetric nonnegativemollifier,66 (@) = = 0 (2) spo B(0.1).Q will be a bounded open set. By Rademacher’s theorem, h. satisfies Dh (a) exists a.e.If U is a bounded open set, lim, 50D (h*W,,) = lim. Dh *y,, = Dh in L' (U;R"*")where y,, is a mollifier. Thus a subsequence converges a.e.Now recall the definition of the degree.Definition 17.7.1 Let Q be a bounded open set in R? and let f :Q— R? be con-tinuous. Let y ¢ f (OQ). Then the degree is defined as follows: Let g be infinitely differ-entiable,If —Gllog < 6 = dist(f (AQ),y),and y is a regular value of g.Then y ¢ g (AQ) and we defined(f,Q,y) = ¥ {sgn (det (Dg (x))): a eg '(y),« <Q}where the sum is finite by Lemma 15.1.5, defined to equal 0 if g~' (y) is empty.Also recall the fundamental integral identity.Lemma 17.7.2 Let y ¢ g (dQ) for g € C® (Q;R?’). Also suppose y is a regular valueof g. Then for all positive € small enough,L $. (g(a) —y) detDg (x)dx =)" {sgn (detDg (x)): x € g™' (y)}The sum is the definition of the degree for g as described. There was also an importantidentity about homotopy Lemma 15.1.13 which includes the following.Lemma 17.7.3 If h is in C? (Q x [a,b] ,R’) , and 0 ¢ h(AQ x [a,b]) then for0<€<dist (0, h (AQ x [a,b])), t > fo O- (h (a,t)) detD, h (x,t) dx is constant for t € [a,b].Let h,, in what follows be hxy,, for h continuous and y,,, a mollifier. Eventually h willbe Lipschitz continuous. Let y € h(dQ)© there is a ball B(y,5) such that d(h,Q,y) =d (hm, Q,G) for all m large enough and G € B(y,6). This follows from the properties ofthe degree. Also, from a use of Lemma 17.7.2, this lemma givesd(Rm,Q,2) = I 6 ¢ (Rm (a) — 2) det (Dm (x)) dxfor all z € B(y,6) for sufficiently small ¢. Now let f € C, (B(y,5)). Then/ f (z)d (lm, 2,2) dz / f(z) [ b¢ (Rm (a) — ) det (DR ()) dxdz[,cet(Dhim (a)) ff (2) Ge (Rm (ae) ~ 2) ded/ f(z) L det (Dim (@)) O¢ (im (w) — z) dxdz