24.5. THE SPACES Lp (Ω;X) 673

Clearly Fatou’s lemma and the monotone convergence theorem make no sense for func-tions with values in a Banach space but the dominated convergence theorem holds in thissetting.

Theorem 24.5.5 If x is strongly measurable and xn (s)→ x(s) a.e. (for s off a setof measure zero) with

∥xn (s)∥ ≤ g(s) a.e.

where∫

Ωgdµ < ∞, then x is Bochner integrable and∫

x(s)dµ = limn→∞

∫Ω

xn (s)dµ.

Proof: The measurability of x follows from Theorem 24.1.10 if convergence happensfor each s. Otherwise, x is measurable by assumption. Then ∥xn (s)− x(s)∥ ≤ 2g(s) a.e.so, from Fatou’s lemma,∫

2g(s)dµ ≤ lim infn→∞

∫Ω

(2g(s)−∥xn (s)− x(s)∥)dµ

=∫

2g(s)dµ− lim supn→∞

∫Ω

∥xn (s)− x(s)∥dµ

and so,lim sup

n→∞

∫Ω

∥xn (s)− x(s)∥dµ ≤ 0

Also, from Fatou’s lemma again,∫Ω

∥x(s)∥dµ ≤ lim infn→∞

∫Ω

∥xn (s)∥dµ <∫

g(s)dµ < ∞

so x ∈ L1. Then by the triangle inequality,

lim supn→∞

∥∥∥∥∫Ω

x(s)dµ−∫

xn (s)dµ

∥∥∥∥≤ lim supn→∞

∫Ω

∥xn (s)− x(s)∥dµ = 0 ■

One can also give a version of the Vitali convergence theorem.

Definition 24.5.6 Let A ⊆ L1 (Ω;X). Then A is said to be uniformly integrable iffor every ε > 0 there exists δ > 0 such that whenever µ (E)< δ , it follows∫

E∥ f∥X dµ < ε

for all f ∈A . It is bounded if

supf∈A

∫Ω

∥ f∥X dµ < ∞.

Theorem 24.5.7 Let (Ω,F ,µ) be a finite measure space and let X be a separa-ble Banach space. Let { fn} ⊆ L1 (Ω;X) be uniformly integrable and bounded such thatfn (ω)→ f (ω) for each ω ∈Ω. Then f ∈ L1 (Ω;X) and

limn→∞

∫Ω

∥ fn− f∥X dµ = 0.

24.5. THE SPACES L? (Q;X) 673Clearly Fatou’s lemma and the monotone convergence theorem make no sense for func-tions with values in a Banach space but the dominated convergence theorem holds in thissetting.Theorem 24.5.5 fx is strongly measurable and xn (s) + x(s) ae. (for s off a setof measure zero) withIlxn (8) || < 8 (8) ae.where Jo gdp < ©, then x is Bochner integrable and[@an= lim | x,(s)du.Qno JOProof: The measurability of x follows from Theorem 24.1.10 if convergence happensfor each s. Otherwise, x is measurable by assumption. Then ||x, (s) —x(s)|] < 2g(s) ae.so, from Fatou’s lemma,[:2e(s)an < tim int [2s (s)— lsn(s)—x(9)|) du[ 28(s)du tim sup f lsu (s) —x(s)|| auJQ Ne Qand so,lim sup } ||%n(s) —x(s)||du <0n—yooAlso, from Fatou’s lemma again,[ We(o)lldu iim int, | |sn(s)llau < [ @(s)au<~JQ n—-00 JO JQso x € L!. Then by the triangle inequality,lim supn—yoo[xvsvan— [snisyan| <tim sup [| ljun(s) —x(s)|| du =0 mn-ooOne can also give a version of the Vitali convergence theorem.Definition 24.5.6 Let CL! (Q;X). Then & is said to be uniformly integrable iffor every € > 0 there exists 5 > 0 such that whenever U(E) < 46, it followsdi <é€[fleasforall f © &. It is bounded ifsup [ Iifllydu <e.fea JQTheorem 24.5.7 Lez (Q,¥,U) be a finite measure space and let X be a separa-ble Banach space. Let { fy} © L'(Q;X) be uniformly integrable and bounded such thatfn(@) + f (@) for each @ € Q. Then f € L' (Q;X) andtim [fa — fil aa =0.n—soo