29.4. OPTIONAL SAMPLING AND STOPPING TIMES 801

Proof: Consider X (1) ,X (τ ∧σ) ,X (τ) . Then

E (X (τ) |Fτ∧σ )≥ X (σ ∧ τ ∧ τ) = X (σ ∧ τ) .

Also E (X (σ ∧ τ) |F1) ≥ X (σ ∧ τ ∧1) = X (1) so this stochastic process is a sub-martin-gale. ■

This optional sampling theorem gives a convenient way to consider the Doob maximalestimate presented earlier.

Proposition 29.4.12 Let {X (k)} be a real valued sub-martingale, and let λ > 0. Thenfor X∗n ≡max{Xk : k ≤ n} as earlier,∫

[X∗n≤λ ]X (n)+ dP≥ λP([X∗n > λ ]) = λP

([(X∗n )

+ > λ])

Proof: Let τ = n and let σ be the first hitting time of the set (λ ,∞) by X (k) . Thenω ∈ [X∗n > λ ] if and only if for some k≤ n,Xk > λ if and only if σ (ω) = k for some k≤ n.By Proposition 29.4.11 X (1) ,X (σ ∧n) ,X (n) is a sub-martingale and the set of interest[X∗n > λ ] is the one where σ < ∞. Then

E (X (n)) ≥ E (X (σ ∧n)) =∫[σ<∞]

X (σ ∧n)dP+∫[σ=∞]

X (σ ∧n)dP

=∫[σ<∞]

X (σ ∧n)dP+∫[σ=∞]

X (n)dP

≥ λP([σ < ∞])+∫[σ=∞]

X (n)dP

Therefore,

E(X[X∗n >λ ]X (n)+

)≥ E

(X[X∗n >λ ]X (n)

)≥ λP([σ < ∞]) = λP([X∗n > λ ]) .■

Now let Xn∗ = min{X (k) : k ≤ n} . What about P([Xn∗ <−λ ])? Let σ be the first hit-ting time for (−∞,−λ ) and note that [Xn∗ <−λ ] consists of the set of ω where σ (ω)< ∞.As noted in Proposition 29.4.11, X (1) ,X (σ ∧n) ,X (n) is a sub-martingale. Thus∫

X (1)dP ≤∫[σ<∞]

X (σ ∧n)dP+∫[σ=∞]

X (σ ∧n)dP

=∫[σ<∞]

X (σ ∧n)dP+∫[σ=∞]

X (n)dP

It follows that∫X (1)dP−

∫[σ=∞]

X (n)dP≤∫[σ<∞]

X (σ ∧n)dP≤−λP([σ < ∞])

and so,

λP([σ < ∞]) = λP([Xn∗ < λ ])≤∫|X (1)|+ |X (n)|dP

Therefore, we obtain the following theorem which is a maximal estimate for sub-martin-gales.

29.4. OPTIONAL SAMPLING AND STOPPING TIMES 801Proof: Consider X (1) ,X (to) ,X (t). ThenE (X (t)|Frrao) > X (GOATAT) =X (OAT).Also E (X (OAT) |.¥1) > X (OATA1) =X (1) so this stochastic process is a sub-martin-gale.This optional sampling theorem gives a convenient way to consider the Doob maximalestimate presented earlier.Proposition 29.4.12 Let {X (k)} bea real valued sub-martingale, and let A >0. Thenfor X~ = max {X;, 2k <n} as earlier,Jog Xorae? > AP ([X; >A]) = AP ([(x)* > aj)Proof: Let t = n and let o be the first hitting time of the set (A,0) by X (k). Then@ € [X;** > A] if and only if for some k < n,X; > A if and only if o(@) =k for some k <n.By Proposition 29.4.11 X (1),X (o An) ,X (n) is a sub-martingale and the set of interest[X,* > A] is the one where o < co, ThenE(X(n)) > E(X(oAn))= |[o<~]X(oAn)dP+ | X(oAn)aPO=0co[ X(oAn)dP+ | X(n)dPJ [0 <co]J [o=c0]IVAP([o < &]) + X (n) dP[o=>]Therefore,E (2iyssajX (n)") > E (ZixesajX (n)) > AP ([o < &]) = AP ([Xy > A).Now let X;,, = min {X (k) :k <n}. What about P (|X; < —A])? Let o be the first hit-ting time for (—e°, —/A) and note that [X;,. < —A] consists of the set of @ where 0 (@) < °%.As noted in Proposition 29.4.11, X (1) ,X (o An) ,X (n) is a sub-martingale. Thus[x(ar < | X(oAn)dP+ | X(oAn)dP[o<e| [o=ee= | X(oAn)dP+ [| X(n)aP[o<e| [o=eeIt follows that[x(ar- x(n)aP< | X(oAn)dP < —AP(|o < oJ)[oe [o<e|and so,AP (|O <]) =AP([Xnx < A]) < [IX()|+1x larTherefore, we obtain the following theorem which is a maximal estimate for sub-martin-gales.