8.5. TRANSLATION INVARIANCE LEBESGUE MEASURE 197

Theorem 8.4.3 Let f ≥ 0 and be Borel measurable. Then for any permutation(i1, · · · , ip) , ∫

f dmp =∫· · ·∫

f (x1, · · · ,xp)dm1 (xi1) · · ·dm1(xip

)(8.10)

Proof: By Theorem 6.1.10 there is an increasing sequence of simple, Borel measurablefunctions {sn} which converges pointwise to f . Since each is a finite linear combinationof indicator functions of Borel sets,∫

sndmp =∫· · ·∫

sn (x1, · · · ,xp)dm1 (xi1) · · ·dm1(xip

)Now apply the monotone convergence theorem to the succession of iterated integrals onthe right and to the single integral on the left to obtain 8.10. ■

Corollary 8.4.4 Suppose f ∈ L1 (Rp,mp) and f is Borel measurable. Then 8.10 holdsfor f .

Proof: This is obvious from applying Theorem 8.4.3 to the positive and negative partsof the real and imaginary parts of f . ■

Another thing should probably be noted. You can use Fubini’s theorem even if the func-tion is not Borel measurable. This depends on Corollary 8.2.11. Say f ∈ L1 (Rp,mp) so itis Lebesgue measurable but possibly not Borel measurable. Then from this corollary, thereis a set of measure zero N such that for x /∈ N, f (x) = g(x) where g is Borel measurable.By regularity, we can also assume N is Borel measurable. Then

∫f dmp =

∫XNC gdmp +

=0︷ ︸︸ ︷∫XN f dmp

=∫· · ·∫

XNC g(x1, · · · ,xp)dm1 (xi1) · · ·dm1(xip

)=

∫· · ·∫

g(x1, · · · ,xp)dm1 (xi1) · · ·dm1(xip

)Since g = f in L1 (Rp) , you can typically use g as a representative of f when using anysort of computation involving iterated integrals. The thing you want is

∫f dmp the iterated

integral is a tool for finding it. Therefore, no harm is done in using g rather than f .

8.5 Translation Invariance Lebesgue MeasureA very important property of Lebesgue measure is that it is translation invariant.

Definition 8.5.1 For E a set, E +x will be {y+x : y ∈ E} .

Theorem 8.5.2 Let E ∈Fp. Then mp (E) = mp (E + z) .

Proof: Let z = (z1, · · · ,zp) . The conclusion is obvious if E is an open rectangle

E =p

∏i=1

(ai,bi) .

8.5. TRANSLATION INVARIANCE LEBESGUE MEASURE 197Theorem 8.4.3 Lez f = 0 and be Borel measurable. Then for any permutation(i1,-°° sip),| fam = [ fr x1,+++ Xp) dy (x3, «--dmy (tip) (8.10)Proof: By Theorem 6.1.10 there is an increasing sequence of simple, Borel measurablefunctions {s,} which converges pointwise to f . Since each is a finite linear combinationof indicator functions of Borel sets,[nam =|. [sul X1,7°° x pdm (xi, )+ “dm (xi,)Now apply the monotone convergence theorem to the succession of iterated integrals onthe right and to the single integral on the left to obtain 8.10. HHCorollary 8.4.4 Suppose f € L'(R?,m,) and f is Borel measurable. Then 8.10 holdsfor f.Proof: This is obvious from applying Theorem 8.4.3 to the positive and negative partsof the real and imaginary parts of f.Another thing should probably be noted. You can use Fubini’s theorem even if the func-tion is not Borel measurable. This depends on Corollary 8.2.11. Say f € L! (R?, Mp) SO itis Lebesgue measurable but possibly not Borel measurable. Then from this corollary, thereis a set of measure zero N such that for x ¢ N, f (x) = g(x) where g is Borel measurable.By regularity, we can also assume WN is Borel measurable. Then=0a| fam = J Pvesdmy + [ AufamyJo [est Xp) dm (xi,)---dmy (xi,,)_ J [3 X1,°°* ,Xp)dmy (xj, )-+-dmy (xi, )Since g = f in L' (IR”), you can typically use g as a representative of f when using anysort of computation involving iterated integrals. The thing you want is [ fdmp, the iteratedintegral is a tool for finding it. Therefore, no harm is done in using g rather than f.8.5 Translation Invariance Lebesgue MeasureA very important property of Lebesgue measure is that it is translation invariant.Definition 8.5.1 For E a set, E-+x will be {y+x:y €E}.Theorem 8.5.2 Let E € .%,. Then my (E) =my(E +2).Proof: Let z = (z1,--- ,Z»). The conclusion is obvious if E is an open rectanglePE= [][ (a2).i=1