272 CHAPTER 11. FUNDAMENTAL TRANSFORMS

=1

∫∞

−∞

g(y)(∫ R

0ei(x−y)tdt +

∫ R

0e−i(x−y)tdt

)dy

=1

∫∞

−∞

g(y)(∫ R

02cos((x− y) t)dt

)dy

=1π

∫∞

−∞

g(y)sinR(x− y)

x− ydy =

∫∞

−∞

g(x− y)sinRy

ydy

=1π

∫∞

0(g(x− y)+g(x+ y))

sinRyy

dy

=2π

∫∞

0

(g(x− y)+g(x+ y)

2

)sinRy

ydy

From Theorem 11.3.5,

limR→∞

12π

∫ R

−Reixt∫

−∞

e−ityg(y)dydt

= limR→∞

∫∞

0

(g(x− y)+g(x+ y)

2

)sinRy

ydy

=g(x+)+g(x−)

2.■

Observation 11.3.7 If t →∫

−∞e−ityg(y)dy is itself in L1 (R) , then you don’t need to

do the inversion in terms of a principal value integral as above in which

limR→∞

∫ R

−Reixt∫

−∞

e−ityg(y)dydt

was considered. Instead, you simply get

12π

∫∞

−∞

eixt∫

−∞

e−ityg(y)dydt =g(x+)+g(x−)

2

Does this situation ever occur? Yes, it does. This is discussed a little later.

11.4 Inversion of Laplace TransformsHow does the Fourier transform relate to the Laplace transform? This is considered next.Recall that from Theorem 11.2.2 if g has exponential growth |g(t)| ≤Ceηt , then if Re(s)>η , one can define L g(s) as L g(s)≡

∫∞

0 e−sug(u)du and also s→L g(s) is differentiableon Re(s)> η in the sense that if h ∈ C and G(s)≡L g(s) , then

limh→0

G(s+h)−G(s)h

= G′ (s) =−∫

0ue−sug(u)du

This is an example of an analytic function of the complex variable s. The next theoremshows how to invert the Laplace transform. One can prove similar theorems about Fourierseries. See my single variable analysis book on the web site for this.

272 CHAPTER 11. FUNDAMENTAL TRANSFORMS= Efe ( [Lemans [eerar) a_ = |.80) (f° 2e08((v—y)t)ar) dy) Sink (x= y) 1s” sinRy= m= — | g(x-y dy=f Oy a fa1 sin Ry= = (x—-y)+8(x+y))x Jo2 “( x— rete) aeydydT JO yFrom Theorem 11.3.5,yim [ cv [e THY g y) dydt— jim2 “eccnetct) sinyRo 71 Jo 2 y_ glet+e(e-)2Observation 11.3.7 ift > [@,e~"”g (y) dy is itself in L! (IR) , then you don’t need todo the inversion in terms of a principal value integral as above in whichlim [|e a e"Y g (y) dydtRoowas considered. Instead, you simply getLf df" eMecyayar = 8 +8EO)Does this situation ever occur? Yes, it does. This is discussed a little later.11.4 Inversion of Laplace TransformsHow does the Fourier transform relate to the Laplace transform? This is considered next.Recall that from Theorem 11.2.2 if g has exponential growth |g (t)| < Ce’, then if Re (s) >1, one can define #g(s) as Zg(s) = fy eg (u) du and also s > £g(s) is differentiableon Re(s) > 77 in the sense that if h € C and G(s) = #g(s), then: G(s+h)—G(s) / _ yslim “SFOS = a's) = | ue“ g(u) duThis is an example of an analytic function of the complex variable s. The next theoremshows how to invert the Laplace transform. One can prove similar theorems about Fourierseries. See my single variable analysis book on the web site for this.