45.3. INTRINSIC NORMS 1487

Now we change variables, letting t = ψ (xn) . This yields

=C (φ)∫

B(0,1)

(∫ 1

0

∫Rn−1

∣∣t f(x′+ xnz′, t

)∣∣p dx′dt)1/p

dz′ ≤C (φ) || f ||0,p,Rn+. (45.2.4)

Now we consider the second term on the right in 45.2.3. Using the same arguments whichwere used on the first term involving Minkowski’s inequality and changing the variables,we obtain the second term

≤ C (φ)∫

B(0,1)

∫ 1

0

(∫ 1

0

∫Rn−1

∣∣∣(ψ f ),n(x′+ xnz′, t

)∣∣∣p dx′dxn

)1/p

dtdy′

≤ C (φ) || f ||1,p,Rn+. (45.2.5)

It is somewhat easier to verify that∣∣∣∣Rg, j∣∣∣∣

0,p,Rn+≤C (φ) || f ||1,p,Rn

+.

Therefore, we have shown that whenever γ f = f (0) = g,

||Rg||1,p,Rn+≤C (φ) || f ||1,p,Rn

+.

Taking the infimum over all such f and using the definition of the norm in

W 1− 1p ,p(Rn−1) ,

it follows||Rg||1,p,Rn

+≤C (φ) ||g||1− 1

p ,p,Rn−1,

showing that this map, R, is continuous as claimed. It is obvious that

limxn→0

Rg(xn) = g,

the convergence taking place in Lp(Rn−1

)because of general results about convolution

with mollifiers. This proves the lemma.

45.3 Intrinsic NormsThe above presentation is very abstract, involving the trace of a function in

W (A0,A1, p,θ)

and a norm which was the infimum of norms of functions in W which have trace equal tothe given function. It is very useful to have a description of the norm in these fractionalorder spaces which is defined in terms of the function itself rather than functions whichhave the given function as trace. This leads to something called an intrinsic norm. I amfollowing Adams [1].

The following interesting lemma is called Young’s inequality. It holds more generallythan stated.

45.3. INTRINSIC NORMS 1487Now we change variables, letting t = y(x,). This yields| / / Pp / '/p /=c) (/ [.. lef (x! -+axn2!,t)| avdt) dz <C(9)|Ifllapan» (45.2.4)Now we consider the second term on the right in 45.2.3. Using the same arguments whichwere used on the first term involving Minkowski’s inequality and changing the variables,we obtain the second termcof. f (a= (Wn (e's) ardne) aedC(O) Alli pam : (45.2.5)It is somewhat easier to verify thatReilo pee SCP) fli pee -IAIATherefore, we have shown that whenever yf = f (0) = g,WRelli pen SCOP) IAL pee +Taking the infimum over all such f and using the definition of the norm inwi-pP (R""')it followsWRslhi pay SCCDIIslly 1 psshowing that this map, R, is continuous as claimed. It is obvious thatlim Rg (Xn) = 8,Xn—0the convergence taking place in L? (R"-!) because of general results about convolutionwith mollifiers. This proves the lemma.45.3 Intrinsic NormsThe above presentation is very abstract, involving the trace of a function inWw (Ao,A1,D, 6)and a norm which was the infimum of norms of functions in W which have trace equal tothe given function. It is very useful to have a description of the norm in these fractionalorder spaces which is defined in terms of the function itself rather than functions whichhave the given function as trace. This leads to something called an intrinsic norm. I amfollowing Adams [1].The following interesting lemma is called Young’s inequality. It holds more generallythan stated.