45.3. INTRINSIC NORMS 1505

Thus,

(yn− xn)2 ≥ 1

2|xn− zn|2−

12|x̂− ŷ|2

and so, the above change of variables results in an expression which is dominated by∫U

∫U

|u(x̂,xn)−u(ŷ,zn)|p∣∣∣ 12 |x̂− ŷ|2 + 1

2 (xn− zn)2∣∣∣(1/2)(n+pθ)

dydx

where y refers to (ŷ,zn) in the above formula. Hence there is a constant C (n.θ) such that45.3.17 is dominated by C (n.θ) ||u||p˜W θ ,p(U)

. A similar inequality holds for the third term.

Finally consider 45.3.19.This equals∫U+

∫U+

|u(x̂,2g(x̂)− xn)−u(ŷ,2g(ŷ)− yn)|p∣∣∣|x̂− ŷ|2 +(xn− yn)2∣∣∣(1/2)(n+pθ)

dxdy

Changing variables, x′n = 2g(x̂)− xn,y′n = 2g(ŷ)− yn, it equals∫U+

∫U+

|u(x̂,x′n)−u(ŷ,y′n)|p∣∣∣|x̂− ŷ|2 +(xn− yn)

2∣∣∣(1/2)(n+pθ)

dx′dy′, (45.3.20)

each of xn,yn being a function of x′n,y′n where an estimate needs to be obtained on |x′n− y′n|

in terms of |xn− yn| . (x′n− y′n

)2= (2(g(x̂)−g(ŷ))+ yn− xn)

2

= (yn− xn)2 +4(g(x̂)−g(ŷ))(yn− xn)

+4(g(x̂)−g(ŷ))2

≤ (yn− xn)2 +2(g(x̂)−g(ŷ))2

+2(yn− xn)2 +4(g(x̂)−g(ŷ))2

and so (x′n− y′n

)2 ≤ 3(yn− xn)2 +6K2 |x̂− ŷ|2

which implies

(yn− xn)2 ≥ 1

3(x′n− y′n

)2−2K2 |x̂− ŷ|2 .

Then substituting this in to 45.3.20, a short computation shows 45.3.19 is dominated byan expression of the form C (n,θ) ||u||p˜W θ ,p(U)

and this proves the existence of an extension

operator provided the Lipschitz constant is small enough. It is clear E is linear where E isdefined above.

Now this assumption on the smallness of K needs to be removed. For (x̂,xn)∈U define

U ′ ≡{

x̂′ = λ

(x̂− b̂0

): x̂ ∈U

}

45.3. INTRINSIC NORMS 1505Thus,1 1. n(Yn ~Xn)° 2 2 Xn ~Zn|? i) Ixy)and so, the above change of variables results in an expression which is dominated by|u (x X,Xn) — U(Y,Zn)|?I hy [4 —9]+ } Om —a9) Roe_ Xn — Znwhere y refers to (y,z,) in the above formula. Hence there is a constant C (n.0) such that45.3.17 is dominated by C (n.@) ||u||? =~: A similar inequality holds for the third term.WP)Finally consider 45.3.19.This equals|u (X, 2g (X) — Xn) —u(Y,28 (¥) —yn)|?I. I. su 2rpey —Ax4Yis - + (in —yn)|Changing variables, xj, = 2g (KX) —Xn,y), = 2g (¥) — yn, it equals|u (X.xn) — UV Indl? ay[.. [. 1. ae dy, (45.3.20)¥-9 Xn —Yn)each of x, ¥n being a function of x/,,y}, where an estimate needs to be obtained on |x’, — yi,|in terms of |x, —y,|.IAS}=|os.+NO—a9S|—" oq3)“—“—NOand sowhich implies(Yn —Xn ) ° =Then substituting this in to 45.3.20, a short computation shows 45.3.19 is dominated byan expression of the form C (n, @) ||x||? =~—,, and this proves the existence of an extensionW9P(U)operator provided the Lipschitz constant is small enough. It is clear E is linear where E isdefined above.Now this assumption on the smallness of K needs to be removed. For (X,x,) € U defineu' = {x =A (%—bo) seu}