1756 CHAPTER 55. COMPLEX MAPPINGS

for all z ∈ B(0,θR) , where M (β ,θ) is a function of only the two variables β ,θ . (Inparticular, there is no dependence on R.)

Proof: Consider the function, H (z) used in Lemma 55.5.4 given by

H (z)≡ log

(√log( f (z))

2πi−√

log( f (z))2πi

−1

). (55.5.23)

You notice there are two explicit uses of logarithms. Consider first the logarithm inside theradicals. Choose this logarithm such that

log( f (0)) = ln | f (0)|+ iarg( f (0)) , arg( f (0)) ∈ (−π,π]. (55.5.24)

You can do this because

elog( f (0)) = f (0) = eln| f (0)|eiα = eln| f (0)|+iα

and by replacing α with α + 2mπ for a suitable integer, m it follows the above equationstill holds. Therefore, you can assume 55.5.24. Similar reasoning applies to the logarithmon the outside of the parenthesis. It can be assumed H (0) equals

ln

∣∣∣∣∣√

log( f (0))2πi

−√

log( f (0))2πi

−1

∣∣∣∣∣+ iarg

(√log( f (0))

2πi−√

log( f (0))2πi

−1

)(55.5.25)

where the imaginary part is no larger than π in absolute value.Now if ξ ∈ B(0,R) is a point where H ′ (ξ ) ̸= 0, then by Lemma 55.5.2

H (B(ξ ,R−|ξ |))⊇ B(

H (a) ,|H ′ (ξ )|(R−|ξ |)

24

)where a is some point in B(ξ ,R−|ξ |). But by Lemma 55.5.4 H (B(ξ ,R−|ξ |)) containsno balls of radius C where C depended only on the maximum diameters of those rectan-gles having vertices ln

(√n±√

n−1)+ 2mπi for n a positive integer and m an integer.

Therefore,|H ′ (ξ )|(R−|ξ |)

24<C

and consequently ∣∣H ′ (ξ )∣∣< 24CR−|ξ |

.

Even if H ′ (ξ ) = 0, this inequality still holds. Therefore, if z ∈ B(0,R) and γ (0,z) is thestraight segment from 0 to z,

|H (z)−H (0)| =

∣∣∣∣∫γ(0,z)

H ′ (w)dw∣∣∣∣= ∣∣∣∣∫ 1

0H ′ (tz)zdt

∣∣∣∣≤

∫ 1

0

∣∣H ′ (tz)z∣∣dt ≤

∫ 1

0

24CR− t |z|

|z|dt

= 24C ln(

RR−|z|

).

1756 CHAPTER 55. COMPLEX MAPPINGSfor all z € B(0,OR), where M(B,@) is a function of only the two variables B,@. (Inparticular, there is no dependence on R.)Proof: Consider the function, H (z) used in Lemma 55.5.4 given byH (z) = log (V" (F(@)) — (2 (F(@)) - ' . (55.5.23)2Ti 2TiYou notice there are two explicit uses of logarithms. Consider first the logarithm inside theradicals. Choose this logarithm such thatlog (f (0)) = In| f (0)| + arg (f(0)), arg (f (0)) € (—2, 7]. (55.5.24)You can do this becauseeloa(f(0)) — f (0) = elnlf(0)| pi@ _ pln|f(0)|+ieeand by replacing @ with @ + 2mz for a suitable integer, m it follows the above equationstill holds. Therefore, you can assume 55.5.24. Similar reasoning applies to the logarithmon the outside of the parenthesis. It can be assumed H (0) equalslog (f (0)) log (f (0) ; log (f (0)) log (f (0))V 20i 7 \ 2ui ~ 1) + iarg (V 20i - V 20i 7(55.5.25)Inwhere the imaginary part is no larger than 7 in absolute value.Now if € € B(0,R) is a point where H’ (€) 4 0, then by Lemma 55.5.211(B(E.R—|6)) 28 (11 (a), MEME ED)where a is some point in B(€,R—|&|). But by Lemma 55.5.4 H (B(€,R—|&|)) containsno balls of radius C where C depended only on the maximum diameters of those rectan-gles having vertices In (Jn +/n— 1) +2mzi for n a positive integer and m an integer.Therefore,JH" (S)(R=E1) _24and consequently24CR—|6|Even if H’(&) = 0, this inequality still holds. Therefore, if z € B(0,R) and y(0,z) is thestraight segment from 0 to z,|H'(§)| <|H (z) —H (0)|H' (w Jaw] = iL H' (tz) zdt¥(0,z)H'( dt < dtfe 2)2| he akiR= 24ClIn| ——]."(ea)IA