63.4. THE BURKHOLDER DAVIS GUNDY INEQUALITY 2135

and now note that([M]τn

)(T )1/2 and (Mτn)∗ increase in n to [M] (T )1/2 and M∗ respec-

tively. Then the result follows from the monotone convergence theorem.Here is a corollary [108].

Corollary 63.4.5 Let {M (t)} be a continuous H valued local martingale and let ε,δ ∈(0,∞) . Then there is a constant C, independent of ε,δ such that

P

 M∗(T )︷ ︸︸ ︷

supt∈[0,T ]

||M (t)|| ≥ ε

≤ C

εE([M]1/2 (T )∧δ

)+P

([M]1/2 (T )> δ

)

Proof: Let the stopping time τ be defined by

τ ≡ inf{

t > 0 : [M]1/2 (t)> δ

}Then

P([M∗ ≥ ε]) = P([M∗ ≥ ε]∩ [τ = ∞])+P([M∗ ≥ ε]∩ [τ < ∞])

On the set where [τ = ∞] , Mτ = M and so P([M∗ ≥ ε])≤

≤ 1ε

∫Ω

(Mτ)∗ dP+P([M∗ ≥ ε]∩

[[M]1/2 (T )> δ

])By Theorem 63.4.4 and Corollary 63.3.3,

≤ Cε

∫Ω

[Mτ ]1/2 (T )dP+P([M∗ ≥ ε]∩

[[M]1/2 (T )> δ

])=

∫Ω

([M]τ

)1/2(T )dP+P

([M∗ ≥ ε]∩

[[M]1/2 (T )> δ

])≤ C

ε

∫Ω

[M]1/2 (T )∧δdP+P([M∗ ≥ ε]∩

[[M]1/2 (T )> δ

])≤ C

ε

∫Ω

[M]1/2 (T )∧δdP+P([

[M]1/2 (T )> δ

])The Burkholder Davis Gundy inequality along with the properties of the covariation impliesthe following amazing proposition.

Proposition 63.4.6 The space M2T (H) is a Hilbert space. Here H is a separable Hilbert

space.

Proof: We already know from Proposition 62.12.2 that this space is a Banach space. Itis only necessary to exhibit an equivalent norm which makes it a Hilbert space. However,you can let F (λ )= λ

2 in the Burkholder Davis Gundy theorem and obtain for M ∈M2T (H) ,

the two norms (∫Ω

[M] (T )dP)1/2

=

(∫Ω

[M,M] (T )dP)1/2

63.4. THE BURKHOLDER DAVIS GUNDY INEQUALITY 2135and now note that ({/]*") (rT)? and (M™)* increase in n to [M] (T)'/? and M* respec-tively. Then the result follows from the monotone convergence theorem. JjHere is a corollary [108].Corollary 63.4.5 Let {M (t)} be a continuous H valued local martingale and let €,6 €(0,°¢). Then there is a constant C, independent of €,6 such thatM*(T)oo ooP| | sup ||M(z)||>e€] | <te [0,7]m1aQE ((M)'"? (7) 48) +P (mM)? (Tr) > 8)Proof: Let the stopping time T be defined byr=int{r>0: (M]!/? (t) > 6}ThenP((M* > el) = P((M* > e] [t= 2]) + P([M* > e][e <a)On the set where [t = <0], M* = M and so P({[M* > €]) << =|, (M*)"dP-+P ([M* > e]n |[m]!!?(r) > 3])By Theorem 63.4.4 and Corollary 63.3.3,< < | iM")'? (7) aP +P ((M* > elm [ia}"??(r) > 8})E JQ= § [.(ony'? rar +r (iar > ein [ang'?(r) > 8))CcIAC [omit (ry nsap+p (om >e]n [im (7) > 5])Cc<& | im'?(r)nsap+P (imi? (r)>5])JQThe Burkholder Davis Gundy inequality along with the properties of the covariation impliesthe following amazing proposition.Proposition 63.4.6 The space Mj. (H) is a Hilbert space. Here H is a separable Hilbertspace.Proof: We already know from Proposition 62.12.2 that this space is a Banach space. Itis only necessary to exhibit an equivalent norm which makes it a Hilbert space. However,you can let F (4) = A? in the Burkholder Davis Gundy theorem and obtain for M € M3? (H),the two norms 1/2 1/2(marae) = (wean (r)aP