2136 CHAPTER 63. THE QUADRATIC VARIATION OF A MARTINGALE

and (∫Ω

(M∗)2 dP)1/2

are equivalent. The first comes from an inner product since from Corollary 63.3.3, [·, ·] isbilinear and symmetric and nonnegative. If [M,M] (T ) = [M] (T ) = 0 in L1 (Ω) , then fromthe Burkholder Davis Gundy inequality, M∗ = 0 in L2 (Ω) and so M = 0. Hence∫

[M,N] (T )dP

is an inner product which yields the equivalent norm.

Example 63.4.7 An example of a real martingale is the Wiener process, W (t). It has theproperty that whenever t1 < t2 < · · · < tn, the increments {W (ti)−W (ti−1)} are indepen-dent and whenever s < t,W (t)−W (s) is normally distributed with mean 0 and variance(t− s). For the Wiener process, we let

Ft ≡ ∩u>tσ (W (s)−W (r) : r < s≤ u)

and it is with respect to this normal filtration that W is a continuous martingale. What isthe quadratic variation of such a process?

The quadratic variation of the Wiener process is just t. This is because if A ∈Fs,s < t,

E(XA

(|W (t)|2− t

))=

E(XA

(|W (t)−W (s)|2 + |W (s)|2 +2(W (s) ,W (t)−W (s))− (t− s+ s)

))Now

E (XA (2(W (s) ,W (t)−W (s)))) = P(A)E (2W (s))E (W (t)−W (s)) = 0

by the independence of the increments. Thus the above reduces to

E(XA

(|W (t)−W (s)|2 + |W (s)|2− (t− s+ s)

))

= E(XA

(|W (t)−W (s)|2− (t− s)

))+E

(XA

(|W (s)|2− s

))= P(A)E

(|W (t)−W (s)|2− (t− s)

)+E

(XA

(|W (s)|2− s

))= E

(XA

(|W (s)|2− s

))and so E

(|W (t)|2− t|Fs

)= |W (s)|2− s showing that t → |W (t)|2− t is a martingale.

Hence, by uniqueness, [W ] (t) = t.

2136 CHAPTER 63. THE QUADRATIC VARIATION OF A MARTINGALE(Ler)are equivalent. The first comes from an inner product since from Corollary 63.3.3, [-,-] isbilinear and symmetric and nonnegative. If [M,M](T) = [M](T) =0 in L' (Q), then fromthe Burkholder Davis Gundy inequality, M* = 0 in L? (Q) and so M = 0. Henceand[ [M,N] (T) dPQis an inner product which yields the equivalent norm. §Example 63.4.7 An example of a real martingale is the Wiener process, W (t). It has theproperty that whenever ty < tz < +++ < ty, the increments {W (t;) — W (t;-1)} are indepen-dent and whenever s < t,W (t) —W(s) is normally distributed with mean 0 and variance(t —s). For the Wiener process, we letFy = Nus10 (W(s) -—W(r) i r<s<u)and it is with respect to this normal filtration that W is a continuous martingale. What isthe quadratic variation of such a process?The quadratic variation of the Wiener process is just t. This is because if A € F;,5 <t,E(2a(IWP=1)) =E (24 (1W()—W (9)? +[W (9)? +2(W (5), W () —W(s))—(-5-+3)))NowE (2a (2(W (s),W(t) —W(s)))) = P(A) E (2W (s)) E (W(t) —W(s)) =0by the independence of the increments. Thus the above reduces toE (24 (|W) —WO)P-+|W OJP @-s-+9)))E(2 (Iw (r) t)—W(s)| ~(t=s))) +E (2a (IW (9)? =5))PAE (|W () —W(s)? = (ts) +E (2a (W(s)? —5))e(24(woi?—)and so E (Iw@P —1|F,) = |W(s)|? —s showing that t + |W (t)|? —¢ is a martingale.Hence, by uniqueness, [W] (tf) =f.