63.5. THE QUADRATIC VARIATION AND STOCHASTIC INTEGRATION 2137

63.5 The Quadratic Variation And Stochastic Integra-tion

Let Ft be a normal filtration and let {M (t)} be a continuous local martingale adapted toFt having values in U a separable real Hilbert space.

Definition 63.5.1 Let Ft be a normal filtration and let

f (t)≡n−1

∑k=0

fkX(tk,tk+1] (t)

where {tk}nk=0 is a partition of [0,T ] and each fk is Ftk measurable, fkM∗ ∈ L2 (Ω) where

M∗ (ω)≡ supt∈[0,T ]

||M (t)(ω)||

Such a function is called an elementary function. Also let {M (t)} be a local martingaleadapted to Ft which has values in a separable real Hilbert space U such that M (0) = 0.For such an elementary real valued function define

∫ t

0f dM ≡

n−1

∑k=0

fk (M (t ∧ tk+1)−M (t ∧ tk)) .

Then with this definition, here is a wonderful lemma.

Lemma 63.5.2 For f an elementary function as above,{∫ t

0 f dM}

is a continuous localmartingale and

E

(∣∣∣∣∣∣∣∣∫ t

0f dM

∣∣∣∣∣∣∣∣2U

)=∫

∫ t

0f (s)2 d [M] (s)dP. (63.5.13)

If N is another continuous local martingale adapted to Ft and both f ,g are elementaryfunctions such that for each k,

fkM∗,gkN∗ ∈ L2 (Ω) ,

then

E((∫ t

0f dM,

∫ t

0gdN

)U

)=∫

∫ t

0f gd [M,N] (63.5.14)

and both sides make sense.

Proof: Let {τ l} be a localizing sequence for M such that Mτ l is a bounded martingale.Then from the definition, for each ω∫ t

0f dM = lim

l→∞

∫ t

0f dMτ l = lim

l→∞

(∫ t

0f dM

)τ l

63.5. THE QUADRATIC VARIATION AND STOCHASTIC INTEGRATION 213763.5 The Quadratic Variation And Stochastic Integra-tionLet FY; be a normal filtration and let {M (t)} be a continuous local martingale adapted toF, having values in U a separable real Hilbert space.Definition 63.5.1 Let F, be a normal filtration and letn—1f= » Se 2 yt] (t)k=0where {ty} is a partition of [0,T] and each fy is Fy, measurable, f,M* € L? (Q) whereM*(@) = sup ||M(t)(@)||te [0,7]Such a function is called an elementary function. Also let {M (t)} be a local martingaleadapted to ¥; which has values in a separable real Hilbert space U such that M(0) = 0.For such an elementary real valued function definet n—1[ fdM =? fe (M (tA tey1) -—M(t At).k=0Then with this definition, here is a wonderful lemma.Lemma 63.5.2 For f an elementary function as above, { fo fdM } is a continuous localmartingale andte(|| [saw0If N is another continuous local martingale adapted to ¥; and both f,g are elementaryfunctions such that for each k,2 t)= [frre (s) dP. (63.5.13)U aJoSM", g,N* € L? (Q),E ((f ram, [ ean) ) = [ta [M,N] (63.5.14)and both sides make sense.thenProof: Let {7} be a localizing sequence for M such that M™ is a bounded martingale.Then from the definition, for each @t t t T[ fdM = lim [| fdM™ = lim ( | ram)0 100 JQ) 1-y00 0