67.3. A SPECIAL CASE 2293

Hence the above is dominated by

≤ 14

M2mn−1

∑k=0

E ||∆W (tk)||4U1+

14

M2mn−1

∑k=0

(tk+1− tk)2

≤ M2

4

(mn−1

∑k=0

(C4 +1)(tk+1− tk)2

)

which converges to 0 as n→ ∞. Then from 67.3.8, and referring to 67.3.5,

limn→∞

12

mn−1

∑k=0

(FXX (tk,X (tk))(X (tk+1)−X (tk)) ,(X (tk+1)−X (tk)))H (67.3.9)

= limn→∞

12

mn−1

∑k=0

(FXX (tk,X (tk))

∫ tk+1

tkΦ0dW,

∫ tk+1

tkΦ0dW

)H

= limn→∞

12

mn−1

∑k=0

(FXX (tk,X (tk))Φ0,Φ0)L2(tk+1− tk)

if this last limit exists in L2 (Ω). However, since FXX is bounded, this limit certainly existsfor a.e. ω and equals

=12

∫ T

0(FXX (t,X (t))Φ0,Φ0)L2

dt,

The limit also exists in L2 (Ω) obviously, since FXX is assumed bounded. Therefore, asubsequence of 67.3.9, still denoted as n must converge for a.e. ω to the above integral asn→ ∞.

Next consider 67.3.4.

mn−1

∑k=0

FX (tk,X (tk))(X (tk+1)−X (tk)) =mn−1

∑k=0

FX (tk,X (tk))(∫ tk+1

tkφ 0ds

)

+mn−1

∑k=0

FX (tk,X (tk))∫ tk+1

tkΦ0dW (67.3.10)

Consider the second of these in 67.3.10. From Corollary 65.5.4, it equals

mn−1

∑k=0

∫ tk+1

tkFX (tk,X (tk))Φ0dW

=∫ T

0

(mn−1

∑k=0

X(tk,tk+1] (t)FX (tk,X (tk))

)Φ0dW

which converges as n→ ∞ to ∫ T

0FX (t,X (t))Φ0dW

67.3. A SPECIAL CASE 2293Hence the above is dominated bymn—1 mn—11 1gi? YY E\lAW allo, +MY (ter 9)”k=0 k=0lA42 [m-1= ( VY G+) (ters 4]k=0lAwhich converges to 0 as n — oo. Then from 67.3.8, and referring to 67.3.5,mn—1jim 5 Y (Fix (tes X (te) (X (ter) —X (te) (X (ter) — X (te) (67.3.9)k=0y mz! Tk Tk= lim = Fey (th,X (t / &aw, | &ydwtim 5D (Hele (4) fe odW, | Po )mn—1= lim 5 Ye (Fix (te, (te)) Bo, Po) y, (teri — te)k=0if this last limit exists in L? (Q). However, since Fx is bounded, this limit certainly existsfor a.e. @ and equals1 T-;/ (Fx (1,X (t)) 0, ®o) vy dt,The limit also exists in L?(Q) obviously, since Fyy is assumed bounded. Therefore, asubsequence of 67.3.9, still denoted as n must converge for a.e. @ to the above integral asn—-,Next consider 67.3.4.mMy—1 mn—1 thay5 Fx (teoX (te)) (X (tes) —X (te) = VF (x(n) ( ods)k=0 k=0 tkmal tk+ Fy (t,,X (tk)) DodW (67.3.10)k=0 tkConsider the second of these in 67.3.10. From Corollary 65.5.4, it equalsMarl tiesFy (t,,X (t,)) PodWk=0 7"T {m-l1= [ ( y K ty ty) (t) Fx fx) DodWk=0which converges as n — © to[ Fy (t,X (t)) Bod W