2398 CHAPTER 70. MEASURABILITY WITHOUT UNIQUENESS

Such an index exists because there exists a convergent sequence un(ω) which does convergeweakly to u. This is just picking another one which happens to also retain measurability.In fact,

{ω : k (ω) = l}={

ω : d (ul ,u)≤ 2−k}∩∩k−1

j=k

{ω : d (u j,u)> 2−k

}Since u is product measurable and each ul is also product measurable, these are all measur-able sets with respect to F and so ω → k (ω) is F measurable. Now we have uk(ω)→ uweakly in Lp′ ([0,T ] ;V ′) for each ω with each function being F measurable because

uk(ω) (t,ω) =∞

∑j=1

X[k(ω)= j]u j (t,ω)

and every term in the sum is F measurable.The following obvious corollary shows the significance of this lemma.

Corollary 70.2.7 Let V be a reflexive separable Banach space and V ′ its dual and 1p +

1p′ = 1 where p > 1 as usual. Let the functions t → un(ω) (t,ω) be in Lp′ ([0,T ] ;V ′) and(t,ω)→ un(ω) (t,ω) be B ([0,T ])×F ≡P measurable into V ′. Here

{un(ω)

}∞

n=1 is asequence, one for each ω . Suppose there is a set of measure zero N such that if ω /∈N, thenfor all n,

supt∈[0,T ]

∥∥un(ω) (t,ω)∥∥

V ′ ≤C (ω) .

Also suppose for each ω /∈ N, each subsequence of{

un(ω)

}has a further subsequence

which converges weakly in Lp′ ([0,T ] ;V ′) to u(·,ω) ∈ Lp′ ([0,T ] ;V ′) such that t→ u(t,ω)is weakly continuous into V ′. Then there exists u product measurable, with t → u(t,ω)being weakly continuous into V ′. Moreover, there exists, for each ω /∈ N, a subsequenceun(ω) such that un(ω) (·,ω)→ u(·,ω) weakly in Lp′ ([0,T ] ;V ′).

Proof: It suffices to consider the functions vn (t,ω)≡ un(ω) (t,ω) and use the result ofTheorem 70.2.1.

Of course when you have all functions having values in H a separable Hilbert space,there is no change in the argument to obtain the following theorem.

Theorem 70.2.8 Let H be a real separable Hilbert space. For n ∈ N let the functions t→un (t,ω) be in L2 ([0,T ] ;H) and (t,ω)→ un (t,ω) be B ([0,T ])×F ≡P measurable intoH. Suppose there is a set of measure zero N such that if ω /∈ N, then for all n,

supt∈[0,T ]

|un (t,ω)|H ≤C (ω) .

Also suppose for each ω /∈ N, each subsequence of {un} has a further subsequence whichconverges weakly in L2 ([0,T ] ;H) to u(·,ω)∈ L2 ([0,T ] ;H) such that t→ u(t,ω) is weaklycontinuous into H. Then there exists u product measurable, with t→ u(t,ω) being weaklycontinuous into H. Moreover, there exists, for each ω /∈ N, a subsequence un(ω) such thatun(ω) (·,ω)→ u(·,ω) weakly in L2 ([0,T ] ;H).

2398 CHAPTER 70. MEASURABILITY WITHOUT UNIQUENESSSuch an index exists because there exists a convergent sequence U,,(~) Which does convergeweakly to u. This is just picking another one which happens to also retain measurability.In fact,{oa:k(o) == {sd (wu) <2* hank {@:d(wj,u) > 2Since u is product measurable and each uw; is also product measurable, these are all measur-able sets with respect to ¥ and so @ > k(@) is ¥ measurable. Now we have Uk(@) > Uweakly in L” ({0,7];V’) for each @ with each function being .F measurable becauseUx(e) (t,@) =} 2ini@)=;)j (t, @)j=land every term in the sum is ¥ measurable.The following obvious corollary shows the significance of this lemma.Corollary 70.2.7 Let V be a reflexive separable Banach space and V' its dual and ; +y = 1 where p > 1 as usual. Let the functions t — Un(@) (t,@) be in LY ({0,7];V’) and(t,@) — Un(q) (t,@) be B([0,T]) x ¥ = Y measurable into V'. Here {Un(o) ty is asequence, one for each @. Suppose there is a set of measure zero N such that if @ ¢ N, thenfor all n,sup || en(o) (t,@)||,, <C(q@).té(0,7]Also suppose for each @ €¢ N, each subsequence of {Un(a) } has a further subsequencewhich converges weakly in L” (0,T];V') to u(-,@) € L”' ({0,T];V') such that t > u(t, @)is weakly continuous into V'. Then there exists u product measurable, with t + u(t,@)being weakly continuous into V’. Moreover, there exists, for each @ ¢ N, a subsequenceUn(c) SUCH that Un(@) (-;@) + u(-,@) weakly in LP ([0,T];V").Proof: It suffices to consider the functions v, (t,@) = Un(@) (t, @) and use the result ofTheorem 70.2.1. JJOf course when you have all functions having values in H a separable Hilbert space,there is no change in the argument to obtain the following theorem.Theorem 70.2.8 Let H be a real separable Hilbert space. For n € N let the functions t >Un (t,@) be in L? ({0,T];H) and (t,@) > un (t,@) be B([0,T]) x F = Y measurable intoH. Suppose there is a set of measure zero N such that if @ ¢ N, then for all n,sup |un (t,@)|,, <C(@).te[0,T]Also suppose for each @ € N, each subsequence of {uy} has a further subsequence whichconverges weakly in L ({0,T];H) to u(-,@) €L? ([0,T];H) such that t + u(t, @) is weaklycontinuous into H. Then there exists u product measurable, with t > u(t, @) being weaklycontinuous into H. Moreover, there exists, for each @ ¢ N, a subsequence Un(w) Such thatUn(@) (+; @) + u(-,@) weakly in L? ({0,T];H).