19.8. STURM LIOUVILLE PROBLEMS 545

Proposition 19.8.1 Suppose yi solves the boundary conditions and the differential equa-tion for λ = λ i where λ 1 ̸= λ 2. Then we have the orthogonality relation∫ b

aq(x)y1 (x)y2 (x)dx = 0. (19.8.44)

In addition to this, if u,v are two solutions to the differential equation corresponding toa single λ , 19.8.38, not necessarily the boundary conditions, (same differential equation)then there exists a constant, C such that

W (u,v)(x) p(x) =C (19.8.45)

for all x ∈ [a,b]. In this formula, W (u,v) denotes the Wronskian given by

det(

u(x) v(x)u′ (x) v′ (x)

). (19.8.46)

Proof: The orthogonality relation, 19.8.44 follows from the fundamental assumption,19.8.43 and 19.8.42.

It remains to verify 19.8.45. We have from 19.8.41,

0 = (λ −λ )q(x)uv+(

p(x)u′)′ v− (p(x)v′

)′ u=

ddx

(p(x)u′v− p(x)v′u

)=

ddx

(p(x)W (v,u)(x))

and so p(x)W (u,v)(x) =−p(x)W (v,u)(x) =C as claimed.Now consider the differential equation,(

p(x)y′)′+ r (x)y = 0. (19.8.47)

This is obtained from the one of interest by letting λ = 0.

Criterion 19.8.2 Suppose we are able to find functions, u and v such that they solve thedifferential equation, 19.8.47 and u solves the boundary condition at x = a while v solvesthe boundary condition at x = b. Assume both are in L2 (a,b) and W (u,v) ̸= 0. It followsthat both are in L2 (a,b,q) , the L2 functions with respect to the measure q(x)dx. Thus

( f ,g)L2(a,b,q) ≡∫ b

af (x)g(x)q(x)dx

If p(x)> 0 on [a,b] it is typically clear from the fundamental existence and uniquenesstheorems for ordinary differential equations that such functions u and v exist. (See anygood differential equations book or Problem 10 on Page 750.)

However, such functions might exist even if p vanishes at the end points.

Lemma 19.8.3 Assume Criterion 19.8.2. A function y is a solution to the boundary condi-tions along with the equation, (

p(x)y′)′+ r (x)y = g (19.8.48)

19.8. STURM LIOUVILLE PROBLEMS 545Proposition 19.8.1 Suppose y; solves the boundary conditions and the differential equa-tion for A = 1; where A, #4 A>. Then we have the orthogonality relation| *alx)y (x) y2 (x) dx = 0. (19.8.44)In addition to this, if u,v are two solutions to the differential equation corresponding toa single 1, 19.8.38, not necessarily the boundary conditions, (same differential equation)then there exists a constant, C such thatW (u,v) (x) p(x) =C (19.8.45)for all x € |a,b]. In this formula, W (u,v) denotes the Wronskian given bydet ( ne ine ). (19.8.46)Proof: The orthogonality relation, 19.8.44 follows from the fundamental assumption,19.8.43 and 19.8.42.It remains to verify 19.8.45. We have from 19.8.41,0 = (A-A)q(x)w+ (p(x) u’)'v— (p(x) v)u= © (pe v—p(xv'u) = £ (POW (2u) (0)and so p(x) W (u,v) (x) = —p(x) W (v,u) (x) =C as claimed. JNow consider the differential equation,(p(x)y')' +r(~y =0. (19.8.47)This is obtained from the one of interest by letting A = 0.Criterion 19.8.2 Suppose we are able to find functions, u and v such that they solve thedifferential equation, 19.8.47 and u solves the boundary condition at x = a while v solvesthe boundary condition at x = b. Assume both are in L* (a,b) and W (u,v) # 0. It followsthat both are in L* (a,b,q) , the L? functions with respect to the measure q(x) dx. Thusb(F.8)2 ang = [| fs@)a(waxIf p(x) > 0 on [a, b] it is typically clear from the fundamental existence and uniquenesstheorems for ordinary differential equations that such functions u and v exist. (See anygood differential equations book or Problem 10 on Page 750.)However, such functions might exist even if p vanishes at the end points.Lemma 19.8.3 Assume Criterion 19.8.2. A function y is a solution to the boundary condi-tions along with the equation,(p(x)y’)' +ri@)y=s (19.8.48)