794 CHAPTER 23. DEGREE THEORY

The main properties of the Leray Schauder degree follow from the corresponding prop-erties of Brouwer degree.

Theorem 23.9.6 Let D be the Leray Schauder degree just defined and let Ω be a boundedopen set y /∈ (I−F)(∂Ω) where F is always a compact mapping. Then the followingproperties hold:

1. D(I,Ω,y) = 1

2. If Ωi ⊆Ω where Ωi is open, Ω1∩Ω2 = /0, and y /∈Ω\ (Ω1∪Ω2) then

D(I−F,Ω,y) = D(I−F,Ω1,y)+D(I−F,Ω2,y)

3. If t → y(t) is continuous h : Ω× [0,1]→ X is continuous, (x, t)→ h(x, t) is com-pact, (It takes bounded subsets of Ω× [0,1] to precompact sets in X) and if y(t) /∈(I−h)(∂Ω, t) for all t, then t→ D((I−h)(·, t) ,Ω,y(t)) is constant.

Proof: The mapping x→ 0 is clearly compact. Then an approximating sequence isFk,Fkx = 0 for all k. Then

D(I,Ω,y) = limk→∞

d(I|Vk ,Ω∩Vk,y

)= 1

For the second part, let k be large enough that for U = Ω,Ω1,Ω2,

D(I−F,U,y) = d(I−Fk|Vk ,U ∩Vk,y

)where Fk is the sequence of approximating functions having finite dimensional range. Thenthe result follows from the Brouwer degree. In fact,

D(I−F,Ω,y) = d(I−Fk|Vk ,Ω∩Vk,y

)= d

(I−Fk|Vk ,Ω1∩Vk,y

)+d(I−Fk|Vk ,Ω2∩Vk,y

)= D(I−F,Ω1,y)+D(I−F,Ω2,y)

this does the second claim of the theorem. Now consider the third one about homotopyinvariance.

Claim: If dist(y,(I−F)∂Ω)≥ 6δ , and if ∥y− z∥< δ , then

D(I−F,Ω,y) = D(I−F,Ω,z)

Proof of claim: Let Fk be the approximations and include both y,z in all the finitedimensional subspaces Vk. Then for k large enough, supx∈Ω

∥F (x)−Fk (x)∥< δ and also,

D(I−F,Ω,y) = d((I−Fk) |Vk ,Ω∩Vk,y

)D(I−F,Ω,z) = d

((I−Fk) |Vk ,Ω∩Vk,z

)Now for x ∈ ∂ (Ω∩Vk) ,

∥(I−Fk)(x)− y∥ ≥ ∥(I−F)(x)+(F (x)−Fk (x))− y∥≥ ∥(I−F)(x)− y∥−∥F (x)−Fk (x)∥> 6δ −δ = 5δ

794 CHAPTER 23. DEGREE THEORYThe main properties of the Leray Schauder degree follow from the corresponding prop-erties of Brouwer degree.Theorem 23.9.6 Let D be the Leray Schauder degree just defined and let Q be a boundedopen set y ¢ (I—F) (AQ) where F is always a compact mapping. Then the followingproperties hold:1. D(I,Q,y) =12. If Q; C Q where Q; is open, Q) NQ2 =O, and y ¢ Q\ (Q,UQy) thenD(I-F,Q,y) =D(I—F,Q1,y)+D(I—F,Q2,y)3. If t > y(t) is continuous h : Q x [0,1] + X is continuous, (x,t) + h(x,t) is com-pact, (It takes bounded subsets of Q x [0,1] to precompact sets in X) and if y(t) ¢(I —h) (0Q,t) for all t, thent + D((I—h) (-,t) ,Q,y(t)) is constant.Proof: The mapping x — 0 is clearly compact. Then an approximating sequence isFy, Fx = 0 for all k. ThenD(I,Q,y) = lim d (Hy, 20Vi.y) =1For the second part, let k be large enough that for U = Q,Q),Q2,D(I—F,U,y) =d (I—Fily,,U Ve.)where F; is the sequence of approximating functions having finite dimensional range. Thenthe result follows from the Brouwer degree. In fact,D(I-F,Q,y) = dU —Fily,Q0V,y)= d(I—Fily,,Q10VE,y) +d I — Fily,, 22.9)D(I—F,Q1,y)+D(U— F,Q9,y)this does the second claim of the theorem. Now consider the third one about homotopyinvariance.Claim: If dist (y, (7 — F) dQ) > 66, and if ||y —z|] < 6, thenD(I—F,Q,y) =D(I—F,Q,z)Proof of claim: Let F, be the approximations and include both y,z in all the finitedimensional subspaces V;. Then for k large enough, sup,.<g ||F (x) — Fx (x)|| < 6 and also,D(I—F,Q,y) = d ((I— Fy) |v, 20Ve,y)D(I-F,Q,z) = d(I—Fk) |y,,29V..z)Now for x € O(QNV;),I — Fx) () — yl I — F) (x) + (F (x) — Fe (2) — 9| — F) (x) yl — FP @) — Fe ll66 —5 =56VoIV IV