34.5. THE IMPLICIT CASE, B = B(t) 1199

+⟨(B(t)−B(s))u(s) ,u(t)−u(s)⟩

= 2∫ t

s⟨Y (r) ,u(t)⟩dr−⟨B(t)u(t)−B(t)u(s) ,u(t)−u(s)⟩

Of course this computation is under the assumption that neither s, t are in the exceptionalset off which B(t)u(t) = Bu(t). In case s = 0 the same formula holds except you need toreplace u(s) with u0 and Bu(s) with B(0)u0 = Bu(0) .

It is good to emphasize part of the above.

⟨B(t)u(t)−B(t)u(s) ,u(t)−u(s)⟩−⟨B(t)u(t)−B(s)u(s) ,u(t)−u(s)⟩

= ⟨(B(s)−B(t))u(s) ,u(t)−u(s)⟩

Lemma 34.5.3 Let the partitions Pk be as above such that 34.5.29, Pk ={

tkj

}mk

j=0. Then

for any m≤ mk,

m−1

∑j=0

⟨B(

tkj+1

)u(

tkj+1

)−B

(tk

j+1

)u(

tkj

),u(

tkj+1

)−u(

tkj

)⟩−

m−1

∑j=0

⟨B(

tkj+1

)u(

tkj+1

)−B

(tk

j

)u(

tkj

),u(

tkj+1

)−u(

tkj

)⟩= ε

m (k)

where limk→∞ εm (k) = 0. Here

εm (k) =

m−1

∑j=0

⟨(B(

tkj

)−B

(tk

j+1

))u(

tkj

),u(

tkj+1

)−u(

tkj

)⟩

Proof: From the above lemma, the absolute value of the left side is no larger than

m−1

∑j=0

∣∣∣⟨(B(

tkj

)−B

(tk

j+1

))u(

tkj

),u(

tkj+1

)−u(

tkj

)⟩∣∣∣

≤m−1

∑j=0

∫ tkj+1

tkj

∥∥∥B′ (τ)u(

tkj

)∥∥∥W ′

∥∥∥u(

tkj+1

)−u(

tkj

)∥∥∥W

(34.5.31)

34.5. THE IMPLICIT CASE, B = B(t) 1199+ ((B(t) — B(s)) u(s) u(t) —u(s))=2[ Wr t))dr—(B(t)u(t)—B(t)u(s) u(t) —u(s))Of course this computation is under the assumption that neither s,t are in the exceptionalset off which B (t) u(t) = Bu(t). In case s = 0 the same formula holds except you need toreplace u(s) with uo and Bu(s) with B(0) uo = Bu(0).It is good to emphasize part of the above.MyLemma 34.5.3 Let the partitions PY; be as above such that 34.5.29, Py = {ur} - . Thenj=for any m <img,¥ (8(a) (be) 8 (6a)e(#) ($a) #4)uw¥, (Fear) (ha) 2 (ef) e() (ein) (a) <0"where limg_40. €” (k) = 0. HereProof: From the above lemma, the absolute value of the left side is no larger than~s k k k k k¥ \((8 (4) -8 (1) eH) (ha) -# (8)j=m—1 ptkjt+1<<> f,j=0 "4;B(a)u (1) || delle (eh) —u (4) I (34.5.31)